User talk:Shayan doust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


December 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Holes (novel) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anbu121 (talk me) 20:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Special Barnstar
congratulations Tristan langford (talk) 21:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Warden Walker (Holes), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Warden Walker (Holes) was changed by Shayan doust (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96353 on 2012-12-13T21:34:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Budgerigar-male-strzelecki-qld.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NtheP (talk) 21:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Loudspeaker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Loudspeaker was changed by Shayan doust (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866455 on 2012-12-13T22:26:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
The preceding warning was issued in error. While the edit was not a particularly good one, in no way did it meet WP:VAND, so I am striking the warning. Please see my comments in the next section. Rivertorch (talk) 09:59, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits[edit]

Hi, Shayan doust. In response to your request for help, I have reviewed your contributions. At least one of them is blatant vandalism. All of the others have been reverted (I reverted one myself just now) because they are not improvements to the encyclopedia. Ironically enough, the one that ClueBot gave you the final warning for was probably your least problematic contribution to date, although I would have removed it too. I'd suggest you spend less time editing and more time reading, paying especial attention to the way sentences fit together to form coherent paragraphs. Positive additions to the encyclopedia are ones that make sense in context and add to the reader's understanding of the topic. Also, you should be very careful about spelling and grammar, and never, ever vandalize. Hope this helps. Good luck! Rivertorch (talk) 09:56, 14 December 2012 (UTC) P.S. Follow this link for basic information about Wikipedia and how to edit it. Rivertorch (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC) .... IM so sorry for the inconvinence, I apoligize :) im so sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheManwhoeditsurpage (talkcontribs) 04:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]