User talk:Sheled Umlal/2009-2010

User talk:Sheled Umlal archive for the years 2009 and 2010

Orphaned non-free image (File:Close to Home.JPG)

You've uploaded File:Close to Home.JPG, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting User:Dylan Howe

Hi, could you please explain your revision to User:Dylan Howe (as shown here)? Your summary of "No CBs Please!!" does not explain anything. My rationale for courtesy blanking was that the page does not conform to WP:UP#NOT, was redundant to the user's article, and that the version on the user page was a violation of a number of guidelines (WP:COI, WP:NPOV WP:SPAM – the article has been rewritten to reflect these). Revisions like this should at least warrant a note on either my talk page or the user's talk page, where a note on my blanking had already been placed. As it stands, the page is a violation of WP:UP#NOT – specifically that it documents a user's non-Wikipedia activities in a promotional manner. I've not reverted your revision, and will wait until your response. Regards, Cycle~ (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bapunque/HaClique

I have moved the page to User:Bapunque/HaClique so that you can use it and continue working on it. You can move it back to the main article space whenever you think it is ready since it was deleted via the Proposed Deletion process, but untill you can find sources to support notability it is likely to be taken to WP:AfD and deleted. Thank you for your contribution in any event. The hard work of article creators is appriciated even by those of us whomore often prune content than write it from scratch. Eluchil404 (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Olam Tzafuf

OK, sorry that you thought my minor edits were "unhelpful". Just so you know, I am allowed to edit that page without permission from anyone, but I'm happy to stay away from it from now on. May I offer you a few pointers?

The name of the article that appears in the lead sentence should be in bold
Every article should ideally have at least one category
The month is spelled "February", not "Febuary"

Happy editing! Zephyrnthesky (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No offense taken, Punque. In addition to the other edits I made, I assumed the album was recorded between June '82 and February '83, so I added the word "to", but if not then I shouldn't have added that. You must be a fan of their music - I don't think I've ever heard them, but maybe I'll check out some of their songs someday. Cheers. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 21:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Done - please review WP:RBK and remember to use it only for blatant vandalism. Pedro : Chat 20:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jaan Pehechan Ho

No offence taken, but I just copied the infobox from Chand Sifarish..... --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 1982 Lebanon War

You would probably want to put it in the article about the band who made the song, or an the article about the song itself. ← George^talk 12:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Close to Home (song)

Done. See User:Sheled Umlal/Close to Home. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of songwriter tandems

In the article List of songwriter tandems, you wrote, "Please don't remove Dury + Jankel, as the writing partnership was influential in the Punk movement; check New Boots and Panties." As stated in the article introduction, the list "is limited to pairs responsible for multiple hit records or hit Broadway shows over a lengthy period of time, with influence and staying power measured in decades." Notwithstanding Dury + Jankel'a influence in the Punk movement, have they had multiple hit records or hit Broadway shows over a lengthy period of time? —hulmem (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:HaClique Lamed.gif

Thanks for uploading File:HaClique Lamed.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Flowered Up A Life With Brian.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Flowered Up A Life With Brian.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:HaClique Lamed.gif

Thank you for uploading File:HaClique Lamed.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HaClique Lamed.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:HaClique Lamed.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]