User talk:Sheredeccan

Welcome!

Hello, Sheredeccan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sheredeccan, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sheredeccan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ravi Narayana Reddy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 22:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Telangana Rebellion. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 10:19, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 04:38, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that if you make an addition and it is reverted, the appropriate course of action for you is to discuss it first and to restore it only if you have attained a consensus for your addition. The onus for establishing consensus for a new addition lies on the one making the addition. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 04:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 04:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend that you carefully go through the five pillars mentioned above in your welcome message. Any additions you make needs to be sourced to reliable sources and needs to be explicitly verifiable from the sources. I've reverted your additions because they are a mix of completely unsourced material, material sourced to poor references and material cited to references which do not explicitly verify the added lines. Note that news sources are not considered reliable for historical topics and self published sources (e.g, Swaminomics) are not considered reliable for anything. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 04:54, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 22:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:05, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]