User talk:Shirleylopezmiami

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Cost per action because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 04:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Conversion funnel. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 04:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shirleylopezmiami, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Shirleylopezmiami! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Llizo Marketing (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Llizo Marketing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Llizo Marketing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Llizo Marketing has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Llizo Marketing. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Shirleylopezmiami. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Llizo Marketing, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Llizo Marketing (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are press releases we require in-depth independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Llizo Marketing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Llizo Marketing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I saw your reason for denial and I disagree, wikipedia also disagrees. Wikipedia states that press releases are citable sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_press_release

Nowhere within Wikipedia does ti state that press releases are not reliable sources and should not be used. I would appreciate it you can site YOUR source for deciding that press leases are against Wikipedias guidelines; considering they have an entire template for citing them.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Llizo Marketing (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I deleted the first version of this under WP:G12, as being almost word-for-word from [1]. This recreation differs from the first version only in some minor word shuffling. It's no longer word-for-word, but probably still fails the "close paraphrase" test for copyright infringement. In any case, it's clearly an advertisement, so totally unsuitable for wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Llizo Marketing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Llizo Marketing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Llizo Marketing has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Llizo Marketing. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Llizo Marketing has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Llizo Marketing. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 17:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]