User talk:Shloidain
Shloidain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked after reverting an edit made to the article New Holland (Australia) that had numerous errors. On top of this, I was given a full site ban despite only a single (relatively minor, in my opinion) edit to fix information that is factually incorrect.
Decline reason:
This does not address the reason for your block, which is abuse of multiple accounts. Please review WP:SOCK and specifically address this. Yamla (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shloidain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Upon reviewing [[WP:SOCK]], I do not understand why I have been accused of this offence. I have made a single basic edit to a page, and how in any way does this suggest that I have committed such an offence? I cannot address a reason unless I can understand what of my behaviour prompted one to believe I have committed this offence. If this is connected to the pre-existing block that is on my IP address, that block exists because of other members within the organisation that owns this device, not because of mine own actions. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= Upon reviewing [[WP:SOCK]], I do not understand why I have been accused of this offence. I have made a single basic edit to a page, and how in any way does this suggest that I have committed such an offence? I cannot address a reason unless I can understand what of my behaviour prompted one to believe I have committed this offence. If this is connected to the pre-existing block that is on my IP address, that block exists because of other members within the organisation that owns this device, not because of mine own actions. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= Upon reviewing [[WP:SOCK]], I do not understand why I have been accused of this offence. I have made a single basic edit to a page, and how in any way does this suggest that I have committed such an offence? I cannot address a reason unless I can understand what of my behaviour prompted one to believe I have committed this offence. If this is connected to the pre-existing block that is on my IP address, that block exists because of other members within the organisation that owns this device, not because of mine own actions. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}