User talk:Shoewide

User talk: showide

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Posner has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Posner was changed by Shoewide (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87738 on 2014-01-14T08:25:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lawline. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 11:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deny the allegations of sock puppetry. This account was used for some minor corrections to links. The Wikipedia article on VoterMarch was recently deleted. Under these circumstances, it was appropriate to give a link to the outside website of Voter March. This is not promotionalism to Voter March and was done in "good faith" to assist Wikipedia readers. There is no harm and this is not vandalism. Wikipedia is part of the Wikipedia Foundation, a not-for-profit educational corporation. The free online Wikipedia encyclopedia says that this is a website that everyone can write and edit. Shoewide (talk) 10:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shorter version: "I am entitled to break the rules if I want to". JohnInDC (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:JohnInDC, no rules were broken. Your initiation of "sock puppet" investigations, complaints and snide remarks are an overzealous "witch hunt" against Louis J. Posner and Voter March. You have not followed the guidelines of Wikipedia, and have demonstrated "bad faith," personal bias, hidden agendas, vindictivesness, and maliciousness.Shoewide (talk) 08:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, give this wounded self-pitying persecution gambit a rest. Go read Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry. You've broken every rule in it. JohnInDC (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lawline (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-->{{unblock|Deny the allegations of sock puppetry. This account was used for some minor corrections to links. The Wikipedia article on VoterMarch was recently deleted. Under these circumstances, it was appropriate to give a link to the outside website of www.VoterMarch.org. This is not promotionalism to Voter March and was done in "good faith" to assist Wikipedia readers. There was no harm to these minor edits and this is certainly not vandalism. Wikipedia is part of the Wikipedia Foundation, a not-for-profit educational corporation. The free online Wikipedia encyclopedia, as well as Form 990 for the Wikipedia Foundation filed with the Internal Revenue Service and the State Attorney General's Offices, says that Wikipedia is a website that everyone can collaborate, write and edit.Shoewide (talk) 08:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]