User talk:Siddelly

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Siddelly. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 03:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Letter from Koshigoe[edit]

Hello! I'm a new page patroller at Wikipedia, and I've seen your recent article—Letter from Koshigoe. Firstly, thank you for your contributions! However, there might be a few problems with this exact problem.

This article is going to need a little bit more context and explanation behind it: aside from the main text that's already published, a few more sentences describing its context might need to be present. Also, it might not be notable enough (see WP:GNG to see what is and is not included). Contributions of this sort—adding texts and translations—would absolutely be appreciated at Wikisource (check it out if you're interested).

If you want, I could move the article to draftspace, where you could edit it until it is complete and ready for the main article space. Again, thanks for your edits! –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 03:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Letter from Koshigoe[edit]

Hello, Siddelly,

Thank you for creating Letter from Koshigoe.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

should be reorganized to comply with wikipedia's layout guidelines, sections should be provided

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wakowako}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wakowako (talk) 06:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC) @Wakowako:[reply]

Thanks for helping set up my first Wikipedia page, I still find all of this

 code work fairly confusing, I have a lot of studying to do.
 I will try to find more information regarding authorship and authenticity with     
 sources when I get a chance.
 Cheers,
 Siddelly (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Outcasts (band) (December 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Social Outcasts (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Social Outcasts (band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Siddelly! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Social Outcasts (band) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Social Outcasts (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Social Outcasts (band)[edit]

Hello, Siddelly. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Social Outcasts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:60th logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:60th logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Iatse bug.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iatse bug.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IATSE local 891 (September 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The union website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IATSE local 891 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info Dan, I will put in a better effort and try again! Siddelly (talk) 16:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]