User talk:Sievert 81
Welcome![edit]
Hi Sievert 81! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! --Vsmith (talk) 23:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Always support any content additions with WP:Reliable sources. Vsmith (talk) 23:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
September 2020[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Sievert 81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I knew this account may have be banned soon because of disruption related to people using this IP and related IPs. I have a sibling that likes to write swear words on Wikipedia. That is what encouraged me to make a counter vandalism account. Basically, once I saw this block, I told her that this was not ok, and I figured out what was happening. Basically, she told her friend (at 174.126.7.230 IP) (we go to their house often) and showed them how to vandalize Wikipedia. That explains the “random” block I saw when I tried to edit during our sleepover. My solution was to use a VPN to get around the block, which happened to also have been used abusively. This is likely what set off this block. I didn’t know that open proxies were not allowed, and this is my fault. The VPN I used was BetterNet. I shouldn’t have used the VPN, and that is my bad. Once I told her what happened to me, she got sad and apologized to me and Wikipedia. She was 12, and didn’t know that it was wrong, thought it was funny. The friend was 15 and a jerk. That explains why on the 1 IP, it was “silly” vandalism, and on the other, it was slurs and racism. I am sorry for using a VPN and my sisters’ actions. I understand if this warrants a permanent block. But I only used Wikipedia to make constructive edits, and counter vandalism. I would appreciate a shorter block or removal of the block. Thanks. Sievert 81 (talk) 02:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a whole long story that just sums up to WP:BROTHER here. Too many weird coincidences for us to believe. only (talk) 03:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So I’m responsible for the actions of others? Is there anything I can do to prove this? If you notice, all of my edits are not vandalism. I would only seek to make constructive edits. I would suggest an IP block of the involved IPs and an exemption for this account as a solution.
Checkuser note[edit]
Confirmed socking via User:Prionopathy.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Unblock[edit]
Sievert 81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can someone please tell me what I need to do to get unblocked? I use shared IPs that hundreds of people including problematic people As I mentioned use.Sievert 81 (talk) 22:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As the editor contradicted their own statement immediately it's obviously not possible for us to trust you at this stage. The advice below is correct in terms of what at least the most likely steps to succeed are - the standard offer, making a new request in 6 months without socking Nosebagbear (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I just don’t understand Sievert 81 (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Don't you think it's a little odd from our perspective that an hour after you unblock request was declined, a new user shows up on your IP address who is also interested in reverting vandalism through RedWarn? only (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, that was my sock and my fault, I thought if I proved I wasn’t a vandal I would be unblocked. Stupid mistake on my part. Sievert 81 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC) @Only
User:Only Sievert 81 (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
None of the other garbage that was popping up was mine. The only sockpuppet i made was prionopathy Sievert 81 (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
So is there any way to get unblocked? Can you just answer that? Sievert 81 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Likely not now. Your "I wouldn't dare sock!" protest followed by "Well, except that one" doesn't sit well for us. Your best bet is to take the standard offer. That means go at least 6 months without socking and then come back to request unblock at that point. No guarantees you'll have it accepted, of course. But it definitely won't be accepted anytime soon. only (talk) 01:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
October 2020[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Proposed community ban of Sievert 81. Thank you. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 00:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
In case you can still read this...[edit]
You were not blocked for no reason; you were blocked by a CheckUser for suspected sockpuppetry. --JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Sievert 81. Thank you.