User talk:Sillybabbit

April 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Richard Taylor (Medal of Honor), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TJH2018 talk 19:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Peter Sam Fan 19:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't threaten me. I'm not vandalizing anything. I am restoring positive contributions you vandalized. Sillybabbit (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Camp Summerlane, you may be blocked from editing. Peter Sam Fan 19:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sillybabbit/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Sillybabbit/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

List of target pages for RV attack by user

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TJH2018 talk 19:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SMALL JIM 19:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am attempting to improve these articles. If you want to vandalize those contributions then you're not here to build an encyclopedia and should all quit editing and find something useful to do. Every edit I did was a positive improvement, all you have done is vandalize positive contributions and make the project and yourselves look petty and stupid. Sillybabbit (talk) 19:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reason you are blocked, for the umpteenth time, is that you are not referencing your changes. Go away. --TJH2018 talk 19:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please, there is nothing in there that needs referencing and several of the changes I made added references if you had bothered to look so that argument is unjustified bullshit and you know it. That has nothing to do with my block. I am blocked because I criticized admins and they want to show the community what happens when they do that. I was bullied out of the project for trying to improve the environment and make it fair for all editors. Way to protect the status quo. But I can just keep reverting your vandalism as many times as it takes. I am here to improve this project even if you aren't. Free Kumioko/Reguyla! Sillybabbit (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have faith in your authority. Go vandalize a Wikia. Just not here. Put your efforts towards something useful, maybe a job? TJH2018 talk 19:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]