User talk:SilverLining1216
Nice work![edit]
|
The WikiCookie | |
| You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more. |
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. SilverLining1216 (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]
Hello, SilverLining1216, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.We're so glad you're here! Matthewvetter (talk) 22:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Just saying hi...I guess haha
Martha Rosler's Wikipedia Page[edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Rosler
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
After looking through and reading bits of the article and comparing it to the "edit source" page, I would say that majority of the article's facts are referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. The only reason why I would say that it wasn't is that not all the facts had references.
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
From what I read there really wasn't anything that distracted me from the info given in the article. I felt as though that everything within the article was relevant to the topic.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
I would say that in my opinion the article is pretty neutral. There really isn't anything pointing to her artwork "being the best" or "being the worst", if we are talking terms of opinion. Everything is fairly consistent throughout the piece.
Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that biased noted?
Most of the information comes from articles that were written about her or about her work. A couple of these even state that they were biographies or interviews that occurred with Mrs. Rosler. I would go to say that it may be that the article itself is neutral, but the references/ sources may not be. They all seem to come from base where people are talking about her and her art.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Her personal life was poorly represented in this article. It only mentions that she collaborates with her son on projects on some occasions. However, I feel as though that maybe her personal life shouldn't be represented here, I don't think wikipedia is the correct place for that.
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
The citations that I checked worked and as far as I know, there isn't any "paraphrasing" or "plagiarism" in the article.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
I'm not quite sure if any info is out or date or missing, I kind of picked this article at random so I cannot necessarily tell you whether or not things are missing.