User talk:Simhaprasad9

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simha Prasad (September 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has no references and does not establish notability.

This draft is an autobiography, the submission of which is strongly discouraged. See the conflict of interest policy for more information.

This draft provides no indication that his writings are notable (e.g., based on sales figures or critical reviews). He may or may not be notable, but, if he is notable, someone else can write his BLP from scratch.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Simhaprasad9! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Simha Prasad

Draft:Simha Prasad, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Simha Prasad and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Simha Prasad during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Delete my draft and unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simhaprasad9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please delete my draft from the sandbox. As my draft is marked as "autobiography", I asked my son (suryasimha) to create my page with all relevant references.As I am new to wikipedia, I dont know the process to delete the article.Please do the needful and unblock me Simhaprasad9 (talk) 21:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 23:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that the article you created has already been deleted. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 23:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)