User talk:Singlebird

April 2020

Hello, I'm ArchonBoi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Samuel So without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ArchonBoi—(Talk) 03:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 88 (number), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 23:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Gong Shang Ri Bao (Tangshan), you may be blocked from editing. --Roy17 (talk) 08:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Samuel So per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samuel So. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:00, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Singlebird (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User:Samuel So is a real name (create his own autobiography Samuel So) and User:Singlebird is a pseudonym. According to Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses: editors who contribute using their real name may use a pseudonym for contributions with which they do not want their real name to be associated / traceable to their real-world identity (Privacy can be a valid reasons for an alternative account in this case). Singlebird (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your claim that the sockpuppet account is for privacy doesn't fly, as both accounts have edited Samuel So. In fact, both accounts have edited the same articles. This is a pretty clear violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 12:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of 3 Days of a Blind Girl

The article 3 Days of a Blind Girl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)