User talk:Sir Gawain

Welcome!

Hello, Sir Gawain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Thorpe | talk 13:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good call![edit]

Thanks for fixing the inaccurate image for Samuel Bernard... an interesting article about the old painting too! ǝɹʎℲxoɯ (contrib) 15:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! I accidentally visited the page of the Ghetty Museum and found (once again) accidentally another appropriate image. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Château des Anglais (Autoire)[edit]

Greetings. You removed the images from the above article because, as you said, "...they show the Château des Anglais in Bouziès." When I created the page I was obviously confident that I had got it right but I accept they may not be the castle in Autoire. However, despite the titles of the pictures, there is no castle with that name in Bouziès that I can find! There is a geographical feature - Defilé des Anglais - in Bouziès, so I wonder if the photographer has got his Anglais muddled when titling the photos. So it could be that these pictures are of the Château des Anglais at Brengues. Or even Autoire. Any definitive ideas? Unfortunately, I can't remember now how I deduced that the photos were of Autoire and the French Ministry of Culture database entries(Autoire and Brengues) do not include pics for either. Emeraude (talk) 18:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The "Château des Anglais" at Bouziès is not a castle but a defensive wall at the entrance of a cave. Please click on the following link that leads you to a map section of the French Géoportail showing the environment of Bouziès. Choose a zoom level two or three leves higher than "Ville" and you'll see the "Château des Anglais". Maybe the fact that it is not a castle but only a wall is the reason why it's not a Monument historique. A Google picture search brings up a lot of photos of the building.

The remparts of Autoire's "Château des Anglais", which was a real castle, look like this. Another photo can be found here. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info and links. From which we may conclude that there are three structures called Château des Anglais in the area? But that at Bouziès is not so much a castle as a defensive wall? Looking at the Bouziès stucture I'm surprised it's not on the Min of Culture inventory, but then the list is rather strange sometimes in what it includes and excludes. Emeraude (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horace Walpole picture[edit]

Hi Sir Gawain. I would have dropped a message on your Commons talk page, but unfortunately I can't find my Commons password and the e-mail account I use to set up my account there is long gone. There's a small problem with the portrait of Horace Walpole (link) attributed to Van Dyck that you uploaded and which appears in the Walpole article; the portrait, while in the style of Van Dyck, is actually by John Giles Eccardt according to other sources, for example the UK's National Portait Gallery (link). I have corrected the caption in the Walpole article, but you might want to fix the Commons version attribution. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 19:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flowerpotman. Thank you for informing me of the wrong attribution. I've corrected the commons description page of the image. -- Greetz Sir Gawain (talk) 10:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No prob :). I saw the attribution on the original website and I was confused too. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready[edit]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Questia online library codes failed to deliver[edit]

We tried to use Wikipedia email to deliver your account access information but you either did not provide an email address in your preferences or had it set up not to receive messages from other editors. You can change both on the first page of Special:Preferences. To fix the situation directly or to let me know you've changed your preferences, just email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers, Ocaasi 05:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ebenrain Castle merger with Schloss Ebenrain[edit]

Sounds good to me. (I started the Schloss Ebenrain article.) Are you planning to start a topic on the talk page? I don't anticipate any opposition to merging. — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 21:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Sir Gawain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sir Gawain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sir Gawain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]