User talk:Sirtaki36
February 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mikhail Tolstykh with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 16:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Mikhail Tolstykh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeairn (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sirtaki36 reported by User:Tgeairn (Result: ). Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mikhail Tolstykh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. -- Sam Sing! 22:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal talk 22:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:MusikAnimal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Amortias (T)(C) 11:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)- Sirtaki, you were edit warring, you were disruptive, you used an IP to make the same edits--and you yelled at someone and called them a Nazi. You can't do that. If you think you can actually improve our project, you'll have to realize you can only do so within our guidelines and policies. If you think you can play by those rules, I suggest you explain how in a carefully crafted unblock request. Good luck. Drmies (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)