User talk:Sissyjoyce12

September 2020[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sissy, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 16:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

how are replacing pictures with outdated crossdressers / fetishists with modern ones vandalism? Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Sissy. Please refrain from adding the same likely self-promotion pictures to articles relating crossdressing/sissy/.. without discussing such change on the relevant talk pages. NJD-DE (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 16:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sissyjoyce12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sissyjoyce12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

LOL you guys are insane. I am going to fight this ti the bitter end lol. Unbelievable how humans with such low intelligence can be given moderating statuses. Insane. Blaming me for self promoting, there is litterly no evidence for that.The picture i uploaded to the sissy page was A CLEARLY BETTER PICTURE OF A SISSY. while yours can be mistaken for a regular crossdresser. Absolutly pathethic. Are your lifes so unimportant that you need to create a fake self made ego on a website? Extremly extremly sad. You CAN CONVINCE NO BODY, that the picture on the sissy page right now is a better, more informed picture then the one i uploaded. You are doing this out of your own taste, and you are not making descisions based on logic. Kinda expectable from humans rotting their lifes away creating fake egos. Time for next steps. Pathethic Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're right it's time for a next step. You're indef blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.