User talk:Sjaswal

Welcome!

Hello, Sjaswal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jaswal has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. - Arjayay (talk) 17:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jaswal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jaswal. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jaswal, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jaswal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also keep WP:3R in mind Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jaswal, you may be blocked from editing. Ashok (talk) 06:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To ashok

Who are you to get me blocked?. A rajasthani doing bogus editing on Himachali page. Continue it nobody considers Wikipedia as genuine source. Sjaswal (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unreliable sources

Hello, Jaswal. Please do not add user-generated content, as you did with edits like this one. This type of religion-related websites, blogs, etc. are considered unreliable on this project. In fact, this project mainly accept academic sources for caste-related details – see WP:HISTRS to know about the standards for caste-related sources. For any query, feel free to ask at my talk page. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As previously explained H A Rose is not a reliable source - please see CasteSources#Writings of British Raj administrators. Please stop re-adding claims based on his writings - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]