User talk:Sjewiki22

Sjewiki22, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sjewiki22! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

=

Welcome!

Hello, Sjewiki22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ground Zero | t 13:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy by design

I see you have deleted the previous entry on this subject.

I have posted a new comment on the talk page and am going to draft a new clean article on the subject.

I will let you know when the new article is ready.

RonaldDuncan (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Hi I added in a summary of the New Digital Security Models Discussion Paper and replied to your other comments RonaldDuncan (talk) 10:43, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I provided a lengthy response on the Discussion Page under Conflict of Interest. I kindly ask of you to undo the damage, you created. "New Digital Security Models" was one of the first attempts after the 2003 EU workshop to provide a thorough coverage with operational definitions focusing on outcome. Trying to defer this to "criticism" is ignoring what this is about. Sjewiki22 (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi do you have a "privacy by design" 2.0. I had a look at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/announcing-citizenkey-providing-small-data-eidas-52-id-engberg/ which was interesting. RonaldDuncan (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to have a conference call to discuss, since that is probably better that going back and forward via talk page texts RonaldDuncan (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure we can have a conference call.

But - for the record - since there is no "Privacy by design" version 1.0 (as it is a generic) it makes no sense to talk about version 2.0 more than it makes sense to talk about Freedom 2.0 just because you disagree with China's claim to fame of a subjective set of guidelines for Freedom 1.0. China do not get to define your freedom more than I do even though they are able to enforce their non-legitimate definition upon citizens with no freedom to object. Sjewiki22 (talk) 10:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Sjewiki22. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.RonaldDuncan (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]