User talk:Skarebo

Please note: If I do not reply to you immediately, it is not because I am ignoring you; I might be busy or offline…

Thanks for the help.

I have noticed that I don't do that, and it's for many reasons. One is what you said, about finding the right template. (So I usually just leave a personal message.) Another is that I've found that certain times, it doesn't make a difference. I know that may make me sound like a "bad editor", but I find it either starts a "war" or people leave multiple messages and it still doesn't help. But I do thank you for trying to help. --JpGrB 21:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

(And I do honestly mean that, I'm sorry if this whole message came off as sarcastic.)

Re: Huggle

Thank you for pointing that out! I guess thats what happens when.. i actually don't know what happened there. Oh well, problem fixed now. Thank you! Metagraph comment 06:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Ex. link

I felt it was innapropriate to have a link to a podcast on a blog. Metagraph comment 08:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: Partipolistikt obundna i svenska kyrkan

It's nothing wrong with my correction. The split was because of several issues (of course) but same-sex blessings was the main, not women ordination where there is not much difference beetween FK and POSK. There was also personal conflicts within POSK which led to the split. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.233.18.253 (talk) 22:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. This mistake with reverting would not happen if your change were accompanied by providing source to verify validity.
So far I was able to find one article that seems to support it: Hallands Nyheter: Homosexuella välkomnas men partnerskap välsignas inte.
Please inform me if you think this source is sutable or you have other links.

The sources in English are prefereble, but in Swedish would do too. Skarebo (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

It works as a source. It's an article about the split and the main focus is same-sex blessings. I haven't found any information in English, but maybe you can use http://babelfish.yahoo.com/ and translate.google.se/ to get a clue about the article. Thanks for looking into this. 83.233.18.253 (talk) 12:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

(selfnotice) √ added source (∆), should be replaced / extended when something better is found. Skarebo (talk) 01:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

California CASA

Hi Skarebo - I must admit I am new to article writing, so I appreciate your input. I looked over the article, and made some changes. Please let me know how you think I can make this more neutral. I am an attorney and have been doing child advocacy for several years. This is an organization that is a stakeholder for child welfare in Calif. and CASA is set up by statute and court rule, which I cited (and linked). After reviewing the article, I do not find anything that says that CASA's does a good or bad job, just that the law gives them a duty as listed.

The stats listed are reported by the Courts, and are actually lackluster in my opinion. I linked all the programs because I thought it would be helpful to those who looked up "CASA."

Also, I looked at the "CASA" page and it is woefully inadequate. I was going to do something there, too, but I decided not to until I go some feedback from you. Thanks for your time and help. 400lbs (talk) 08:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)400lbs

I've answered on your talk page. Hope it will help. Skarebo (talk) 01:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey please stop censoring me!

Hey please stop censoring me! What I'm writing on the Carl Cox page is actual relevant information you can check it. http://www.djmag.com/index.php?year=1997&op=top100dj&top100dj_op=results if this continues I will report you.

He is the first person to ever be number one of the DJ list from DJ Magazine! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simsimdabear (talk • contribs) 04:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

You always start conversation with threats? Interesting… Nice people skills you've got.
btw, this “censored” information (∆) definetely didn't look like relevant.
In the future you may prevent such reverts by using Preview button and saving articles not in a borken state.
P.S. One more thing: informative edit summary is always useful. Skarebo (talk) 07:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

:(

All i want is to be loved....... :"( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.161.101 (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC) why are you so mean to me???!!! :"(

Then be constructive!
Read this for useful info: Wikipedia:Introduction, and do some good. Skarebo (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Rapid help with an anonymous user

Thanks a lot with your help in responding to my vandalism report, or to repairing the collateral damage as it may be. I've still to learn how to use my Wikipedia trigger-finger to its fullest extent. Decoy (talk) 19:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Oops… :-) I think you wanted to say it to User:Toddst1 (∆).
And about responding to vandalism: I'd recommend installing Twinkle — very useful multipurpose tool. It will help your trigger-finger a great deal. β-)
Another helpful little thingy: Navigation popups.
Good luck! Skarebo (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

G20 major economies

Please clarify ‎at Talk:G20 major economies why you did your recent reversion of a referenced value for an infobox field. Thanks. 68.167.252.47 (talk) 06:00, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

It was incorrect assessment. Thanks for pointing this out. Skarebo (talk) 06:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

CSI edit

i erased the CSI paragraph because it is false information: william petersen still stars in CSI season nine and lawrence fishburne is nowhere to be seen . lady heather never apeared in episode 5 of the ninth season —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.8.205.214 (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Well… you erased it without explanation—definitely unconstructive. btw, it's not exactly false information. It's somewhat mistaken, because the new character will be introduced in season 10 (CNN: Fishburne joining 'CSI'). Little advise: In the future you should try to improve instead of tearing down.
P.S. And for that (∆2 & ∆1) each article has a dedicated talk page. Skarebo (talk) 11:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Peter Lavelle's page

You recently edited back Peter Lavelle's page. I ask you, do you know anything about the man whose reputation you are protecting? He is regularly seen around moscow entertaining prepubescent girls (this is not a joke), and is almost certainly abusing them - he clearly only lives in Moscow as such behavior is more acceptable than in the States. Please take responsibility for your actions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronaldoron (talk • contribs) 12:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm protecting reputation of Wikipedia.
What Wikipedia is not: “Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not: Scandal mongering or gossip. Articles about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy. Articles should not be written purely to attack the reputation of another person.”
Besides… this your edit was a blatant vandalism. Skarebo (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Courchevel Ski Resort Guide

Hi

It appears as if you have removed the link to our resort guide to Courchevel (http://www.courchevelskichalets.co.uk). I am unsure as to why as it is a comprehensive resort guide to Courchevel including catered chalet accommodation not featured on Courchevels tourism website. I have also looked at other entries, for example in Meribel that have very similar sites to ours but not as comprehensive? Look forward to your comments.

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cateredskichalets (talk • contribs) 10:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

You really should read these pages: What Wikipedia is not & Spam. Skarebo (talk) 10:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Do Ya/Stay With Me

Hello

Some days ago I edited the page "Do Ya/Stay With Me", the single of the band McFly. I changed that fact that on the Single the song "Lies" would be there, instead of "The last Song(Live)".

You reverted that and accused me of vandalism. This is wrong.

On all the webpages, including McFly's myspace, they say that on the single, the song "Lies" will be included. NOT "The Last Song".

Please remove that accusation of vandalism of my IP address. Thank you and have a nice day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.83.132.80 (talk) 12:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. I believe that your edit was made with good intentions. The problem is that you faild to provide any edit summary, so I had to base my decision on available information. Before I reverted the change I checked the reference in the article – it shows 4th track as “The Last Song (Live)”. Now I've investigated this issue a little bit more – it seems that CD track list was changed somewhat late (club-mcfly) and quite a few music stores still show the old one. You may want to replace the reference in the article with something more current. Regards, Skarebo (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

American Pie

How does the removal of excessive Madonna information from the Don McLean American Pie article constitute vandalism? The information regarding her cover is excessive and if valid should be moved to a seperate page, originally her version took up more room on the page than the original, all links at the bottom where in relation to other songs by her with no links to any other Don McLean work —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.234 (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

The Madonna cover version was shit, though? 92.12.119.209 (talk) 13:20, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Your AIV report on Sat_liverpool

Thank you for your report on Sat_liverpool (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I have however declined to block for the following reason:

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. I left him a warning instead.

If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Cheers! -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Blacklight

please come discuss the reversion u made. thank you. here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Black_light#Introduction

Cakes Downey (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

√ Done. Skarebo (talk) 11:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I know where humans started, it was Lyra

What I wrote about Lyra is the truth, why is that vandalism? I know where humans started, it was Lyra. I added that in because it's truth and we're not taught it in school because we're dumbed down. Allow me to post this please, this is important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jc2k301 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

There are many places in internet where you can spread this “truth”. Wikipedia is not one of them… Skarebo (talk) 17:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeffrop6691

I noticed his original edit, ClueBot noticed his second edit and your account noticed his third via Huggle. Should we submit the account to be blocked?
Limideen 16:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Well… user is warned, more vandalism → report, but now it's just too soon. Skarebo (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Account creation system

Someone, probably you, has requested access to handle account requests. Please reply here to confirm it was you, for security purposes. Stifle (talk) 14:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I did. Skarebo (talk) 15:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Your account was approved. Please review WP:ACC/G before acting on any requests. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page or in #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect on freenode. - Rjd0060 (talk) 18:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Reverts

Are you using a bot to revert and give out level 2 warnings?—StaticVision (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Not only that, but many other levels and things… :-) It's not a bot, but a counter-vandalism tool called Huggle. Since you are rollbacker, you can run it too. Skarebo (talk) 11:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, will check it out :)—StaticVision (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Why did you make fun of my creative editing

You're a meanie! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gr8estatgames (talk • contribs) 13:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Tricky vandal

Hi Skarebo,

Careful with reverting to the correct version of the article when rolling back vandalism. Sometimes the vandals are a little crafty... Hiberniantears (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I've noticed it. It's just Huggle is not so good for digging through article's history. I was looking at it in the browser—to finish with Twinkle, but you did it faster! :) Skarebo (talk) 13:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. I've done it many times myself! Hiberniantears (talk) 13:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Mary Downing Hahn

Thank you for catching the person making edits to the Mary Downing Hahn page. Unfortunately, they did make one more edit. I just reverted the edit done by this person (assuming the person is the same) on the Judy Blume page and noticed changes were made to other authors as well, like Gary Paulsen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quistisffviii (talk • contribs) 22:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Good! I'm glad, that we helped to stop this vandal(s), now their IP is blocked for 6 weeks. Skarebo (talk) 03:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Danny Coulson

Please do not revert this page back to its original content. I have made minor changes excluding an affiliation between Mr. Coulson and a former employee. He no longer has an affiliation with this employee and I would like the wikipedia page to reflect that.

Thank you!

Danny Gosser (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC).

The only reason for my revert was page blanking. I've assumed that either it's a mistake, or you're going to update this artile. But it's not a good reason to leave it empty for an hour… Even if the changes are major, an article should not be blanked. In the future, please, use the proper maintenance messages. Another option is to prepare the new version in the sandbox or by using “Preview” button. Thanks, Skarebo (talk) 22:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

ACC

Hello. With regards to this ACC request, you made a mistake in creating it. Because the username sounds like a company name or a self-promotional name (especially when the email is considered), it is a violation of the username policy, and thus should not be created and should be closed as UPolicy. In the future, please be careful not to make mistakes like this, as access to the tool can and will be revoked. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 07:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Since the name in question was a user's real name (Firstlast) + profession, it didn't seem to fit “promote a group or company”. As far as I understand, the personal names are not prohibited by username policy. While this may be a result of me overanalyzing the available info, imho to call it a mistake is a stretch. On the other hand—if you consider it as a proper approach, I will apply the username policy in a more narrow way from now on. Thanks, Skarebo (talk) 08:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for the reversion. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

'Weasel words' on the entry for the Spanish-American War

Your description - 'weasel words'- would rather suggest your particular bias in this matter. I have none except that wherever and whenever possible Wiki entries should be balanced and truthful. I am, at present, on holiday and am paying for net access. Once I am home again and can collate references, I shall supply all necessary citations and then some. But for starters, how about 'The Meaning Of The Maine' by Louis A. Perez, Jr? Broadly, I have for some time been alarmed at an often pro-American bias on Wikipedia, which, if it exists as I suggest, contradicts completely the avowed aims of this website. Pfgpowell (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Slow down, please… Here (∆) is the only my recent edit to this article. My guess – you want to talk to someone else (∆). Skarebo (talk) 00:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For consistent anti-vandalism efforts Pikiwyn talk 14:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Skarebo (talk) 07:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Ted Schmidt Living Person Biography

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should not be added and if present, must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. Fictitious character is a drug abuser. Would not be opposed to a disambiguation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.89.190 (talk) 11:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

The question is: should this biographical article exist at all?.. There are notability guidelines, you know… Skarebo (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Permission has been verified through OTRS (see ticket # above) for the version of the article as appeared here. This material at www.epluri.com has been released into public domain. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

   And at Ticket:2009061710060304 too. Stifle (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 

"This article is about a living person, and must adhere to the policy on biogrpahies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should not be added and if present, must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous." - Wiki policy

The article is about a living person: Ted Schmidt (Talent Agent) It has been repeatedly edited, and redirected to a fictitious person, Ted Schmidt (Character in "Queer as Folk). This character has personal problems including drug and pornography addictions which make this listing libelous to the living person Ted Schmidt (Talent Agent).

As Wiki articles typically appear in the top search engines, I am respectfully requesting that the living person be granted precedence over the fictitious person. Failure to do so is libelous, negligent, and reckless; resulting in an undetermined amount of financial damage to the living person.

Equal time for a living person to avoid libel should be enough justification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.89.190 (talk) 12:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

"Permission has been verified…" — permission to use the text from website, that's it.
"I am respectfully requesting that the living person be granted precedence over the fictitious person." The living person should qualify for inclusion (see Wikipedia:Notability (people)). It's not enough just to be alive — there are >6 billion people on the planet.
"Failure to do so is libelous, negligent, and reckless; resulting in an undetermined amount of financial damage to the living person." Careful here… Skarebo (talk) 12:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

"Careful here" - Suggest you heed your own advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.89.190 (talk) 12:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

You got a joint man? it would be a lot cooler if you did.

What are you doing up at 4am reading Martha Washington and "dollar bill" pages? get a fucking life loser. do you hate America or something? if you would crawl out from under the rock youve been under for 20 years, youd have seen the film Dazed and Confused. Im not a 4am wikipedia administrator like yourself so i dont know how to cite that as a source, or i would have . tell me what i need to do to get true information on the Washington pages (including unlocking George's page). me and Team Blunt have thousands of edits to make so TTFN—Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.78.32.125 (talk) 08:17, 11 October 2009

Well… I'm cleaning after the vandals like you, thanks for asking.
And regarding the true information… do you mean this one? Skarebo (talk) 08:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

What the heck

What was so Biased about the Phenomenon page, eh? (From Username: anonymous) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.38.231.26 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Nothing, until this. It's an unnecessary pov statement and WP:OR. Skarebo (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi 1 I am nandulapranav1, user of wikipedia.

Hi ! Skarebo 1

This is the first time I am creating an article in Wikipedia. I hope you know my article - Lying - The Root Of All Evils [1]

As this is the first time I am creating an article, I was thinking that if you would agree to keep the article or not. Please don't think that I feel sad if you remove this page.

I think that some information which I gave is not useful for the people.

If you have any problem like this, please tell me. Please tell me what is wrong with my information.

Loads of thanks, Pranav Nandula. Class - 4, adilabad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nandulapranav1 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I think that you'll find the coments on the AfD page (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lying - The Root Of All Evils) to be very enlightening. Skarebo (talk) 01:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Skarebo ! am nandulapranav1 again !!

Skarebo, tell me one thing. Are you a great member of Wikimedia and all its other products like [2] Answers.com, [3]Wikimedia and all other products ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nandulapranav1 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

‡-/ (somewhat confused…) Skarebo (talk) 01:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion.

Okie Dokie, kind of lagging it with Mortum Crypt. However, this all began with the band Crematorium, when I googled them and found that they were NOT on wiki. I then checked other bands, and since I haven't written any pages thought this would be my first... that blew over. No hard feelings though, I too have undone some vandalism, so yeah, I get you, I hate misinformation.

Thanks! SlightError (talk) 06:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm glad we have an understanding. :) I have nothing against this band, it just fails the notability guideline (WP:BAND) and does not merit an article of its own. Skarebo (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Patrick Arundell

Hello, Skarebo … your speedy delete of Patrick Arundell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) may have been declined, but I've stuck a {{Prod}} on it … maybe you would care to add a {{Prod-2}} in support of its deletion? If you do, please update the {{Oldprodfull}} tag on the article's talk page. :-)

Happy Editing! — 141.156.161.245 (talk · contribs) _{05:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)}

 Done. Skarebo (talk) 06:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

User:Vaibhavyawalkar/SVNGMC_YAWATMAL → SVNGMC YAWATMAL — [Brief reason for page's name change (article completed)]

Hi, Vaibhavyawalkar. So, you've written the start article about this college and want me to move it into the mainspace? Gladly.
Lets just clarify & fix a few things:
• It seems that the proper name is “Shri Vasant Rao Naik Government Medical College”. Correct?
• The name of the city is spelled as Yavatmal, not Yawatmal. You need to fix that.
Well, it's not so bad for the first article. :) Skarebo (talk) 06:39, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done. → Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College

Talkback

Hello, Skarebo. You have new messages at Intelligentsium's talk page.
Message added 22:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Intelligentsium 22:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Mike Cox page vandalism

Will you please now ban Adambradford82? He spends Mon - Fri deleting and replacing the Mike Cox page. Thank you.

He already received a final warning --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Billyjoeyjimmybobby (talk • contribs) 15:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

 Done: reported → temporarily blocked. Skarebo (talk) 21:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, they trashed and delete whole cloth the Mike Cox information, articles and links again on Dec 7 and 8. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billyjoeyjimmybobby (talk • contribs) 20:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Stop threatening Wikipedia Users

Please stop threatening wikipedia users as you did with 125.18.239.135 Or else you will be blocked from editing. User was right,info which he/she deleted was off topic as well as wrong.

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Coercorash (talk • contribs) 04:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, my… it was you… Don't like when your POV pushing get reverted, eh? Not my problem. Skarebo (talk) 11:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Editing "tungum alloy"

im very sorry to break this to you sir, but it was not me that was editing your alloy page. If you believe it was me, then you nedd to get your system checked. Yours sincerely, Bob —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.253.2 (talk) 11:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Checked : ∆1, ∆2. Skarebo (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Stop reverting my edits

Stop reverting my "unconstructive edit" when, as noted in the talk page, it was a legitimate one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.169.1.147 (talk) 06:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Yep, right… Skarebo (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

People are mammals too

People are mammals and they live in the Holy See. Please put it back, removing it is vandalism.75.161.89.113 (talk) 10:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Actually, act of removing people is classified differently… Skarebo (talk) 10:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

And that is ...75.161.89.113 (talk) 10:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

…depends on a scale. Could be genocide. ¦-/ Skarebo (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't think that is very funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.89.113 (talk) 10:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. Skarebo (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

So will you please undo your vandalism? 75.161.89.113 (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Now that was funny. Skarebo (talk) 10:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

What?75.161.89.113 (talk) 10:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Attention

You suck

That is all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.25.100 (talk) 11:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Da aeon (band)

Hi. part of the work on New Page Patrol involves checking the page history before applying a CSD tag. In doping so you might find that a similar tag has already been illegally removed by the article creator. Remember that the more warnings we can place on such creators' talk pages, the more chances we have of stopping their vandalism and helping them to understand Wikipedia policies :) Cheers, --Kudpung (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

:-/ been there, done that… ∆ Skarebo (talk) 10:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

ZlFing

Thanks for reverting all those bad edits by User:ZlFing. DH85868993 (talk) 22:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Alleged vandalism and flat earth

The Qur'an explicitly states that the earth is flat: "'And Allah has made the earth for you as a carpet (spread out), (71:19) 20:53 "He Who has made for you the earth like a carpet spread out; has enabled you to go about therein by roads (and channels); and has sent down water from the sky." and some other interesting cosmology: 'See ye not how Allah has created the seven heavens one above another' (71:15) (which actually confirms to the Ptolemaeic world view). See Qur'an text Also mainstream Islamic scholars believed that the earth is flat.

I do not believe that correcting misleading or even false information, however embarrassing or inconvenient it might be for religious apologists, constitutes vandalism according to Wikipedia policy. 87.208.211.206 (talk) 11:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Not every addition to Wikipeida requires one to cite their source

No one with any knowledge about the subject matter at hand would dispute the veracity of what wrote. It is all easily verifiable. I doub't you could find single Lubavitcher on either side of the issue who disagreed with any of it. You can easily find the source for the material I added by merely Googling it. What specifically do you object to? There is another Wikpedia rule about reverting material when you the option to edit it. It is considered bad form to just revert material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.254.220.120 (talk) 01:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

“You can easily find the source for the material I added by merely Googling it.” — Good, then it should be easy for you. Just google it and add the source. Skarebo (talk) 02:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Re

Oops. My mistake. I'll be sure to look more into it while reverting. Got a bit confusing with all the IP edits. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT 01:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

"American Nationalism"

I put some stuff on the American Nationalism page. You changed it because it was biased, but it was not as biased as the stuff that was on the page when I got to it.... Someone should fix that. Thanks. -bmd2012@stanford.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.56.238.175 (talk) 06:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

You put not “some stuff”, but your opinions. Such comments are more appropriate for the article's talk page. Skarebo (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Preterist view on Seven Seals page

Hi Skarebo, I posted the preterist section on there and have been working on that page. I was trying to revert that guy from deleting that section off the page. But somehow there was an edit conflict. I wasn't trying to delete that section as it appeared in your comment.Jasonasosa (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I think you've misunderstood the revert comment — it simply means that I've reverted this article several versions back and your edit was one of them. You've missed some changes, so I had to dig deeper… :) Skarebo (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh, okay, thanks Jasonasosa (talk) 12:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

World Yoga Society

hi, thanks for editing my article.. but i want to add some picture ... which are genuine ...can i add those in wikipedia ... since i am new to editing ... please help me.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.185.165 (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Well… first, you have to read this. Skarebo (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

"I'm not vandalizing!"

Vandals really hate you, don't they? :P --* Galilsnap - [ Talk • Contribs ] 03:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

It can't be helped… ;-) Skarebo (talk) 05:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

I removed the last paragraph on Haris Vlavianos's page becauase it is based on a false accusation which underimines the integrity and reputation of this well-known poet. In an old collection of his he adapted a poem by an Irish poet, who is a close friend of his, to his knowledge. This poet, Michael Longley, not only knew about this adaptation but a few years later he wrote the introduction to Vlavianos's "Selected Poems" volume that was published by "Dedalus Press" in Dublin in 2008. Moreover, he was invited to Athens by Vlavianos himself to be present at the launching of his book of poems, entitled "Homer' Octapus", that Vlavianos translated. The unknown person that keeps editing Vlavianos' page [he signs as "Agnostosgnostos", which means in Greek, "Unknownknown"] obviously wants to cause damage to this person by lying about his work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.103.25.79 (talk) 06:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

maybe I am vandilising

but I'm also a qualified expert, more used to writing academic papers than wikipedia articles. I removed material within my area of expertise that I consider encourage illegal activities.

the material was also uncited. are you telling me I need a reason other than the material have no citations to remove it? when the material is considered by most experts in the area to mislead the public, possibly into illegal, immoral, silly behaviour? like keeping large wild animals from tropical jungles as pets?

I guess I do. I'm one of those vandals that hates you it seems.

I'm also genuinely busy. I think you should remove the material. all else being equal, none of it was verifiable.

good luck with the glass bead game or whatever you boys are playing here. It isn't scholarship whatever it is. Duracell (talk) 07:14, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

John Charles Gilkey

The article is about a living person and is libel. It is defamation of character and copies have been sent to attorneys. THe book is only a certain percentage of truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JBURNER666 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

As you claim to be that person here, you need to read WP:COI and not edit the article further. Please also keep in mind that all legal proceedings are a matter of public record. Please also keep in mind that making legal threats violates WP:LEGAL. You need to change your behaviour immediately. Srobak (talk) 15:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Reviewing Dairy Cattle Showmanship

Hello I am a freshman at Clemson University and in English 103 we are writing articles in Wikipedia. I am doing Dairy Cattle Showmanship which is something that I am very interested in. Attached is the link to my sandbox and I was wondering if you could look over it and give me any pointers? Thanks! Rlane92 (talk) 00:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rlane92/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template%3AUser_sandbox%2Fpreload&editintro=Template%3AUser_sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlane92 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Enrique Gil Page

Hi, want to clarify something, i didn't even edited the content of Enrique Gil Page. I just made some changes to the format copied the format of "Filmography" and apply it to "Discography". is that a problem? kindly reply :) Thanks :) Double Melody (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Nope, it's a misunderstanding. Thank you for clarifying it. Skarebo (talk) 16:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

I think my comment was constructive

My comment was very constructive and you are disobeying the wikipedia policy act,section 14 clause 12. I could report you for this but in my good will i won't as long as you don't do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.188.183.157 (talk) 17:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

(Talk page stalker comment) @86.188.183.157: There is no such thing as "wikipedia policy act,section 14 clause 12", and if it had been me reverting your blanking on Guatemala I would have given you a considerably more stern warning than the one Skarebo gave you. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 17:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all you do to combat vandalism!  :) Wikipelli Talk 13:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Heisenbugs

why did you attack my contribution? I only wanted to point out that the humorous attribution of bugs to 'phases of the Moon' has an occasional basis in reality. There is nothing unconstructive about that.85.211.108.83 (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Waterspout

Hi,

Watch out when you are making formating about the meaning of the sentences. In this article you use the template CONVERT in order to convert a temperature of 19°C to 66°F. However the sentence in the article was not for a température in Celsius transformed to Farenheit (Celsius multiplied by 1.8 + 32), it was : "this requires 19°C a temperature difference which is 34.2°F (Celsius multiplied by 1.8). I had to correct.

Pierre cb (talk) 04:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Yep, mistake. On the other hand, 34 °F is better — precision is not that high. Skarebo (talk) 06:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

OK. Pierre cb (talk) 15:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

About the update on the Buffalo Niagara Airport

Hello, if you notice on the article, there are 2 notations. I updated the second notation which just seemed to be a duplicate of the first with the correct information, as US Airways / US Airways Express is merging into the American Airlines group, becoming American Airlines and American Eagle respectfully. Please undo your correction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:C102:CA5A:C5B1:88D1:2321:173A (talk) 07:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I cannot find any confirmation that US Airways Express is to be re-branded as American Eagle. In fact, the reference on US Airways Express page that supposed to confirm this info actually contains nothing about it. Please, provide the better source. It will help both articles. Skarebo (talk) 08:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Driving License In Lebanon Article

Hello,

Considering you asked about why did I remove the "Obtaining a driver's license" part. Well I noticed that it's already mentioned in the document. Somehow a couple of sections below so it would be a bloat to mention it twice, don't you think?

Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.209.107.137 (talk) 07:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, you right about it. Skarebo (talk) 08:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

editing used car article

i added a ten step to buying a used car to the used car article and i added the source so i hope you will not delete it this time

Used car: edits deletion

I'm the owner of the content and the owner of that website so why are you deleting my edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redjohn11 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

1) Wikipedia is not a "how to" manual.
2) The content inserted by you is copyrighted, and it does not look like the license is compatible with Wikipedia requirements. Skarebo (talk) 08:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi!

I did not edit this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Game%20of%20Thrones%20%28season%203%29&diff=686780486, in any manner whatsoever. This is not a shared computer/IP either, so I'm unsure how you attributed the edits to me. Regardless, no harm, no foul, I guess.

Good day.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.21.223.86 (talk) 11:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

The party NAME is incorrect sir. We have two major political parties in this country the DEMOCRAT and REPUBLICAN party. The DEMOCRATIC party doesn't exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.40.4.192 (talk) 07:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)