User talk:Skhawk98

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, Skhawk98, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.We're so glad you're here! Matthewvetter (talk) 22:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elise_Stefanik

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Yes, each fact has a reference. Some facts even have multiple references. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? All the information is relevant to the topic. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is neutral. Stefanik belongs to the Republican party, but there does not appear to be any republican bias in the article. Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that biased noted? The information comes from academic journals and reputable news sources. However, some of the news sources are strictly republican, which could present a problem. I didn't find the information taken from these sources to be problematic. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, the viewpoints appear balanced. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? I clicked on five links and they all worked. There is no sign of paraphrasing or plagiarism from the sources I checked. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? None of this information is out of date. There is not much information about her time as a U.S. representative but this is probably because Stefanik took office very recently.

Assignment[edit]

This is for the assignment, good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sk106512 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Congressional Union page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]