Jump to content

User talk:Skier Dude/archive/archive May 08

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, Mr.Skier

[edit]

I'm Beedox I appreciate you talking to me on this subject, I don't think of the poster as censorship I just thought it was offensive to the actress Monica Bellouchi and I keep in mind that there is a lot of countries who are pretty conservative about this (like arab countries where I come from) and I think the poster I uploaded was pretty nice Anyway, thank you for your concern and I will stop editing the poster of the film thank you very much once again for your concern

Hi, Mr.Skier.......again

[edit]

I just Created my user page and I wanted to know if my page does not violate any Wikipedia laws I'd appreciate it if you take a look at it and give me ways to improve it Am I free to put any content in it?????

Deletion Review for Terahnee

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Terahnee. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- OranL (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Rainbow television.jpg . ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It was a one of those classic nostalgic TV shows, which I watched as a kid. Great stuff ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 21:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hay

[edit]

Hay, it said you published a book, what's the name or ISO of it? DB9 (talk) 01:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, congrats on getting it/them published! I think it would be a great accomplishment if I were ever to publish one of my own books someday.DB9 (talk) 20:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tonin'.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tonin'.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Tetsuo Harada

[edit]

Hi, please, as much as you ask to be nice and polite I would appreciate you don't make me waste my time and energy by simply erasing my work. I am putting back the file education-influence-tetsuo.png, please be polite, don't erase it. I am working hard on this article, with all necessary permission if you checked further I sent an e-mail to persmission@wikipedia .... shave a nice day, and learn to control your bot better, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesarharada (talkcontribs) 22:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tonin' album cover image cropping

[edit]

Hi - see my comments regarding your Tonin' "cropped album cover" question on my talk page User_talk:Pugetbill#Image_question. Let me know if this doesn't answer your questions. Best regards, Pugetbill (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi SkierRMH!
We thank you for uploading Image:Scan0028.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hey Skier, my fellow wikipedian! We've got a character adding tons of link spam to many, many film articles (Geneon web site). See The Crooked Way, as an example. Name is: User talk:Mark Lungo. If I'm correct, I think it's best if you handle the situation. Also: see The Big Combo, where he even declares the site is a sales site. I will make a note on his TALK page, but we'll see. My best -- Luigibob (talk) 20:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Skier Dude/archive/archive May 08!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diane Wilson

[edit]

Hello

Could you explain your deletion of Diane Wilson. I did not see the article as published, despite it being on my redlinked watchlist. What did the article say ? I feel she is a notable person in the world. Peace,

rkmlai (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vlcsnap-1358875.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vlcsnap-1358875.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Rilo Kiley

[edit]

Why was Spanish Rilo Kiley deleted? Their CD is coming out from Saddle Creek, one of the largest independent record labels that exists, and one of their members is a famous writer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.89.32 (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Egger

[edit]

Tool abuse?

[edit]

I'm pretty sure the protect button isn't for protecting against bots tagging policy violating images. Please unprotect so it can be tagged. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 17:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I am very sorry for accusing you of abusing your tools!

Here, have a cookie :) CWii(Talk|Contribs) 22:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project

[edit]

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage correction

[edit]

It says on your userpage that you've made over 90,000 contributions to this Wikipedia. When I looked you up, the edit counter that I used said that you have 100,000 edits. May I change the infobox on your userpage to reflect that new information or would you rather be the one to do it? Cheers, Razorflame 01:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lea Wait image

[edit]

No reason to delete. That image came from Lea Wait, and permission under Wiki rules was given to upload it!!!--Dumarest (talk) 20:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Skier I'm rather confused at why some of these images have been tagged. The first one has a full rationale and mentions the article numerous times it is used in. Could you help sort it out? Cheers buddy

♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 09:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jack Thwaites.jpg

[edit]

Hello, you removed this image although all the right information had been provided including GFDL tag and the email from the source of the work clarifying that the image was licensed under GFDL - this was forwarded to wikipedia permissions. If you are going to remove the image again, please be more precise about what the problem is, otherwise it is difficult to know what to correct for a resubmission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgream (talkcontribs) 09:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so I notice this image has been relisted for deletion. Can you tell me exactly what needs to be done? So far: 1. we have an email from the source of the image saying that it is under GFDL. 2. we have forwarded this email to permissions and wikipedia. 3. we have marked on the image that it is GFDL and included a statement from the email just mentioned. what else can we do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgream (talkcontribs) 20:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Convert/Maintenance/outputs/standard

[edit]

I think I might have made a mistake. There are a bunch of pages I've been putting up for deletion. Template:Convert/Maintenance/outputs/standard wasn't meant to have been one of them. Would you mind undeleting it? Sorry. JIMp talk·cont 05:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

... Thanks ... but somehow Template:Convert/Maintenance/outputs2 got done too another mistake. JIMp talk·cont 06:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thaks again. I don't know what was going on ... maybe I'm half asleep. JIMp talk·cont 06:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

... I've figured it out ... the templates I wanted deleted were transcluded onto those pages putting them in the speedy cat too. JIMp talk·cont 06:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I was up to ... JIMp talk·cont 06:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of User:Gibmetal77/Licence

[edit]

Hi there, why was my page deleted even though I undid the deletion request? --Gibmetal 77talk 07:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Gibmetal 77talk 14:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

malayalam movie question

[edit]

What year is this movie shot ? Thanks !! Do you have any ext. link ??
            Twenty thousand pipes (talk) 11:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

            I tried to google without luck - got lots of the actress information, but not the movie . . .
                        Ta !!

Hey Skier...are we having fun yet?

[edit]

Re The Hurricane (1999 film)
I think you were on vacation for a while...I trust you had FUN!... By the by, a Wikipedian removed an image on an article I have worked on (and added, to be frank). It's the soundtrack cover. I reverted the deletion. Am I wrong? I think the inclusion of image is legit. Please let me know if I am off-track. Thank you Skier. Luigibob (talk) 16:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to stick a leg out and trip you in your alpine session but I have been botted the follwoing images. Im not certain they all have major problems but right now I'm plagued with an FA candidacy, rleiable source debates and general wikiying. Could you help a bald man in need. Even its ust a few, I wouldn't want to see the images deleted again

Thanks a lot for that Skier. The problem on most of them appeared to be that they were used in two articles which triggered the bot. How are you anyway? Unfortunately we don't seem to discuss anything other than images these days LOL!! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 08:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is some confusion over Argentine copywright. Photographs are professed to enter PD 20 years after it was taken but with works of art (which I believe includes film posets/images etc) I think I read something about 50 years after the death of the all of the film producers/directors etc. Still, I feel certain that many of those posters are public domain and don't need a fair use rationale but we have to be certain ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 08:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 03:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of photos for Helipad in English - improper license

[edit]

Hi SkierRMH,

I have noticed you have deleted the images I added to my addition to the Helipad article in English on retractable helipads. I have full permission to use the images for the purpose of communicating the retractable helipad system. Could you please assist me with regards to the license? Many thanks to you in advance...Best wishes, Antony Addy (talk)

Log details below...

   * (Deletion log); 03:23 . . SkierRMH (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Retractable helipad - yacht.jpg" (I3: Improper license)
   * (Deletion log); 03:15 . . SkierRMH (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Retractable helipad - mountain.jpg" (I3: Improper license)
   * (diff) (hist) . . Helipad‎; 03:15 . . (+8) . . SkierRMH (Talk | contribs) (deleted image removed)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonyaddy (talkcontribs) 09:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply] 

Redundant images

[edit]

Please make sure an image is unused before deleting it under I1 (see [1]). The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have a similar problem. You removed an image that was used in an article (see here [2]) which caused it to be orphaned and eventually deleted. I had to contact the administrator to restore it. If you look at the link above, you removed the image on May 4th. The image Image:Nfk.png was tagged {{di-orphaned fair use|date=5 May 2008}} the next day because of not being used, and eventually deleted on May 12 (log [3]). I was not aware of the problem because the bot did not notify me. Please look into this problem, and let me know if I'm mistaken. Thanks --Kimse (talk) 02:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

[edit]

Can you undelete this image? [4] It was replaced on the Syd Barrett page with a blatant copyvio from Flickr which I'm about to report. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 03:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Nobody of Consequence (talk) 05:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:WA 53 475.jpg on images for deletion

[edit]

I do not see how these images are incorrectly licensed, but the project that they were downloaded for was discontinued, so feel free as far as I am concerned to delete the lot if you wish. In fact, I encourage you to delete them immediately.--Drboisclair (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daylight saving time image

[edit]

Re the image you recently deleted from Daylight saving time; could you please respond at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 April 19 #Image:Time-differences-brz-us.png? I'll watch there. Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 04:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The contributor verified that they are the copyright holder of the website in question, so he has the right to place the image into the public domain. Can you please remove the pui tag from Image:Time-differences-brz-us.png? Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 06:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm lost. Can you please follow up again on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 April 19 #Image:Time-differences-brz-us.png? I left details about why I'm lost there. Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 07:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More Bot attacks

[edit]

HELP! I've been under attack by the bot for days, I fixed at least ten images the other night and removed them from my talk page, As soon as it was done it started on me again! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 19:25, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For being the fastest and nicest skiier on the web

250,000 + between us? That is friggin awesome. Ah you know why I am getting so many bot calls don't you. A year and a half ago I started workin through Argentine films beginning with A and obviouslt the bot its going through A. Unfortunately at that time I wasn't aware of some of the bot "policies". Ut does my head in logging in a seeing fifty images on my talk page! P.S. do you reckon I should accept adminship? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 09:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved them to User:Blofeld of SPECTRE/Friggin images in need of saving. 44kb of them!!! Oh I can see you;ve done loads already thanks for that. Once done can you help remove them from the list.? Once they are done they can de rmeoved from the "friggin list"! Its not good having that fired at you. The early days are coming back to haunt me ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 19:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SofíaBozán.jpg was deleted. Argentine photos pre 1988 or public domain if not taken from a film. So it should be fixed with a public domain tag ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 21:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Its mainly going to be those Argentine films!! If the FritzBot gets approval to start adding the missing 1.5 million places I will be returning to concentrating on film again like the old days. Italian, French and Hong Kong cinema in particular!!! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 09:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


re: Image:Golem of It!.jpg

[edit]

I have added a rationale for this image. Is this sufficient for stopping the deletion of this image? Let me know--Drboisclair (talk) 16:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate how you in your work are making sure that this website follow the best standards of law and equity. I think that sometimes when some of us download we do not read the instructions well enough. This is what "juried websites" and "quality control" are all about. Thanks.--Drboisclair (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

T'was okay to delete "Image:OLPC guitar probe coil 3b.jpg"

[edit]

Bill here: I was having problems with uploading files to the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) wiki, so I tried an upload to wikipedia, where obviously it worked just fine. But then I realized I couldn't get rid of it -- in fact, that's a question I have: how does one go about deleting such things -- perhaps an image is no longer necessary and its author deems it should be deleted. (This image was/is original work, and I could have stuck a GNU on it, but it wouldn't have a "home" so it had to go no matter what.) Sorry for the bother. Bill Wvbailey (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have noticed that you deleted the image Image:Heathrow Terminals After.png on 19 February 2008 claiming that the image lacked copyright information. Would it be possible for the image to be restored if I can supply the source information? The image diagram itself was self made by User:Amistry.mistry using an edition of airports magazine as the source of information of which I will try and find the issue number. The image was also quite a useful diagram to illustrate the article London Heathrow airport. Thanks very much. Tbo 157(talk) 22:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring the image. I have provided the relevant summary information. Can you check if it is ok? I don't think it needs a fair use summary as it was entirely self made by the user specified using the source mentioned for information only. Thanks very much. Tbo 157(talk) 12:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm wondering why this was deleted. I know it was tagged for CSD:I4, but it appears that it did have a valid licesens and source. Am I missing something? --Selket Talk 03:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you can , I would advise that you read the copyright entry for the image one more time and carefully note the meanings of the words and phrases in the entry . I often find this necessary when reading repetitive lists and such . I assume from your many language certifications that the issue is a voluntary failure to read the entry and not an inability . Either way , I thank you for your attentiveness , but I must protest your obtrusiveness . Although you may think that you are providing an important service for all of us by deleting our images , I assure you that I am perfectly capable of deleting images that I think need to be deleted and have no need of your help . I am sure that you have other opportunities that could occupy your time much more productively than indiscriminately deleting images and encourage you to explore those . If not , I have a large volume of scanning work ( of public domain content , of course ) that requires the level of particularity that you seem to possess . Contact me .

--Frank.trampe (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your talk pages , I see that you are already well occupied by non-deletion-related tasks and have no need of additional work . Although I see from some of the other talk entries that some users clearly have no grasp of Wikipedia's copyright rules and need some guidance , I consider myself a good copyright soldier . I encourage you to entrust the deletion of my images to me so that you can focus more upon other more important work , like Image:Untitled1.JPG , whose necessity makes an interesting statement about average intelligence levels .

--Frank.trampe (talk) 06:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arrgh this article has lost all its images. Perhaps restore the most useful ones? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 17:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I loved that film. As you know I am a huge western fan anyway but that combined with the sci-fi elements and general good humor is fun. Critically it probably wasn't exactly much to shout about, but it isn't intended to be the greatest shot film of all time. Great fun. I met Christopher Lloyd when I was in Santa Monica back in 1997 when they were filming on the pier for My Favourite Martian. June 1997 and it wasn't released until 1999! Have some footage of him on video cam but no photos. Incidentally i cropped the image we have of him now but we could do one of him when he was in his prime. Great guy ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GBMC Update

[edit]

Curious why GBMC logo and hospital images were deleted? What guidelines did the uploaded images not meet?

Thanks, Jnhaswell —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnhaswell (talkcontribs) 20:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Deletion

[edit]

As for deleting images , one can simply change the copyright status to logo and remove its references . It disappears very quickly ( about one week , I think ) .

I have the entire River Roads collection . There are no branding transfer contracts . Further , there is no record of any copyright of the branding .

In terms of ownership , all I really have are the paper copies of the branding and verbal agreements from the past two owners that I get what is roughly defined as the River Roads stuff . I can send in a ticket , but it seems to add little value unless I get disclaimers from all of the past owners and the design firm . I have addresses for all of them ( although the most recent owner recently closed its office due to some budget problems ) . I don't want to spend my summer securing the disclaimers , though , so I'll just submit the ticket .

--Frank.trampe (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Taggers

[edit]

I also have a concern about a particular image crawler ( I can't recall which one . ) that puts warning flags on images marked as « Used with permission » or something similar even if they have other tags , like « logo » or « fair use » or something similar . It seems that having an extra permission mode ought not to make an image less suitable for display . Do you know which crawler this is ?

--Frank.trampe (talk) 05:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Image Deletion

[edit]

Back on the subject of the River Roads logo , I fail to see why copyrighted logos for other entities ( airlines , schools , and such ) are fair game for inclusion even in absence of permission but copyrighted logos of shopping malls are not . It seems that it still ought to fall under the logo rules . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank.trampe (talkcontribs) 05:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-reviewing article

[edit]

Hello! Sorry to bother, but you had reviewed an article that I began, Jacques Brel is Alive and Well and Living in Paris (film), and you rated it as a stub-class offering for the WikiProject Films effort. Since then, the article has been substantially expanded. If your schedule allows, I would ask if you could please return to the article and review it again, since it outgrew its stub origins. Thank you very much. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I think you left the same message from my Talk Page on the Jacques Brel page. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for your helpful feedback. Sadly (for me, at least), the article didn't make the WP:GA grade at this time. But I'll give it another go and see what happens. I appreciate your input. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dejima pic

[edit]

Hi, you just deleted my pic: Image:Kisenato.jpg. I must have got the license wrong or something; but it is my picture that I took with my camera. How can I ensure your speedy delection won't happen again? Thank you. FourTildes (talk) 06:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped/Altered public domain images

[edit]

Hi, I have a question regarding the correct tag to use when uploading images here or on commons. If I crop or alter a PD image, say by chopping one player out of a 1960s Argentine football squad photo and altering the colouration. Can I use the{{self}} tag? The reason I ask is that I am unsure whether my work in altering the PD image makes it at least partly my own work. Cheers EP 11:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion

[edit]

Sorry to be another one of those folks, but, "you deleted my image" - File:Kips bay.jpg. I was wondering - is there any recourse for me on this? I found the NYPL link on Wikipedia:Public_domain_image_resources, and I did actually call the permissions desk of the library, where I was verbally granted permission to use this image on Wikipedia. Did I tag improperly? Is this not a valid way to "earn" permission to use an image? I'm admittedly a bit naive on this front, but I'd really like to use this image for Landing at Kip's Bay (for obvious reasons). Thanks for any help you can give. Tan | 39 16:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other

[edit]

Hi Skier. I've a few left to do at User:Blofeld of SPECTRE/Friggin images in need of saving. Could you take car eof it? I'm currently dabbing ready for over 1 million new articles from the newly approved Fritz Bot! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 19:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]