User talk:Skirtland

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Skirtland. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! JZ CL 15:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC) ~~==Speedy deletion nomination of Vollrausch==~~ [reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vollrausch, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 15:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Actio libera in causa
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Actio libera in causa, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 15:27, 12 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Actio libera in causa

Actio libera in causa is a law principle in Continental laws. A person who voluntarily and deliberately gets drunk or cause mental illness in order to commit a crime is guilty of that crime even though at the time he commits the prohibited conduct he may be blind-drunk and acting involuntarily.principle.

Vollrausch is a law principle which complement Actio libera in causa in German laws. If a person who voluntarily and deliberately gets drunk but he or she did not intend to commit a crime before dranking but he or she did harmful activity, he or she might be punished by 'Vollrausch'

Talkback

Hello, Skirtland. You have new messages at This lousy T-shirt's talk page.
Message added 15:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary - moving info around from wikis

Please note in edit summaries when you pull CC-BY-SA copyrighted info from other wikis.--Lucas559 (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project

A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements.

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yeonbaek County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administrative divisions of Korea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: delete "Territory of the Republic of China"

I have proposed deleting the Territory of the Republic of China article that you recently created. Please read and respond at that article's talk page. Phlar (talk) 17:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ryukyu Islands dispute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ryukyu Islands dispute. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Senkaku Islands dispute. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Senkaku Islands dispute – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 12:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Territory of the Republic of China

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Territory of the Republic of China. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Taiwan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Taiwan – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 12:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actinocenes

Really? Seems like an incredibly narrow topic. --Smokefoot (talk) 16:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Unypoly (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

appealing blocks

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skirtland (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Unypoly Skirtland (talk) 08:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unconvincing. Sam Walton (talk) 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

conclusive evidnce

There is a conclusive evidence about Orient-Kor and Mailzzang+aus are sockpuppets. (ko:위키백과:사랑방 (일반)/2015년 제18주#온라인상 유니폴리 및 기타 트롤링 사례에 대해 페이스북 등으로 연락 받습니다.) Mailzzang+aus said that he is Peter Park on April 2015.

And Lee Gye-deok, friend of Peter Park, said the article about Lee Gye-deok in Korean Wikipedia was originally made by Peter Park. (ko:위키백과:위키백과:사랑방 (일반)/2014년 제13주#이계덕, 한국의 위키피디언에게 고소를 예고)

According to the deleted history log, the article about Lee Gye-deok in Korean Wikipedia was originally made by Orient~kowiki. Global steward may investigate this conclusive evidence. --Skirtland (talk) 08:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unypoly, please can I call on you to reflect on your past bad conducts? Mr Lee is also one of my colleagues as same as Mr Park. This is very enough to know both of them. In addition, there is no proper evidence that Mailzzang+aus is Mr Park. This is just suspicion or mal-complaint against him who reported you to police. If you would not submit enough evidence, this can be also reported to the police as you malicious complained. You have to regret them, as you are suspected criminal throughout Korean Wikipedia. Orient-Kor (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not complaint about this detection through http://gall.dcinside.com/board/view/?id=dcwiki&no=89606&page=1 and http://gall.dcinside.com/board/view/?id=dcwiki&no=89601&page=1. Please note, I, Mr Lee and Park also carefully and occasionally check your bad and mal-complaint outside of Wikipedia Orient-Kor (talk)

Dear Mr/Ms Administrator, I also carefully request block this Unypoly's sockpuppet from his discussion page? Kind Regards Orient-Kor (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Do not tell lies. [1] https://archive.is/ubzLx

Maillzzang+aus said "안녕하세요, 위키페디아 동료 여러분, 위키에서는 메일짱+Aus를 사용하고 있으며, 본명은 박호언입니다." and "저는 이번 사건에 대해 미래창조과학부 ICT 규제개선 모니터로서,"

First sentence means "Hello to Wikipedian college. I use Maillzzang+aus in this wiki, and My real name is Hoeon Park(박호언)". Second sentence means "As I am a monitor on Creative Economy & Regulatory Reform, Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning"

It is obvious Maillzzang+aus is Peter Park(박호언) --Skirtland (talk) 10:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr/Ms Administrator, Please unblock me. --Skirtland (talk) 10:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inha Univesity Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inha Univesity Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inha Univesity Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jodosma (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Earth science

Wikipedia:WikiProject Earth science, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Earth science and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Earth science during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 13:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Earth science

Template:WikiProject Earth science has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 16:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Start-Class Earth science articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Start-Class Earth science articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 16:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:FA-Class Earth science articles

A tag has been placed on Category:FA-Class Earth science articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 16:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Draft-Class Earth science articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Draft-Class Earth science articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 17:02, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:File-Class Earth science articles

A tag has been placed on Category:File-Class Earth science articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 17:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:WikiProject Earth science has been nominated for discussion

Category:WikiProject Earth science, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:WikiProject Earth science participants has been nominated for discussion

Category:WikiProject Earth science participants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]