User talk:SkumbergletheRat

March 2023

Hello, I'm Sariel Xilo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dungeons & Dragons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dungeons & Dragons, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 23:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source is owned by the people who own DnD (wizards of the coast) so it’s actually a very reliable source. SkumbergletheRat (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Dungeons & Dragons. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please don't remove section on Talk pages. The section will eventually get archived automatically. For more about this, read WP:TPG and WP:ARCHIVE. Woodroar (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read what i said about it? I made a clear explanation as to why, as well i was involved with the problem and it was then resolved. So i see no reason as to why it should still be taking up room on the D&D talk page. SkumbergletheRat (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Dungeons & Dragons. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i would like to resolve the problem, but it is more logical to delete that part of the talk page than keep a non-relevant conversation. I will contact them to resolve it. SkumbergletheRat (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As per Woodroar above, article talk page discussions are not removed unless they're moved to an archive page or are a violation of a specific Wikipedia guideline (ie. harmful or prohibited material). This was an on topic conversation (about sourcing & article scope) which makes it a relevant discussion so it shouldn't be removed until it is archived. For more information on this, please review Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines & Help:Archiving a talk page. I would also suggest checking out Help:Introduction & Wikipedia:GLAM/Beginner's guide to Wikipedia. Sariel Xilo (talk) 16:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you. SkumbergletheRat (talk) 16:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]