User talk:Skyranger of utopia

1

Turn The Tide (Johnny Hates Jazz song)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Turn The Tide (Johnny Hates Jazz song), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Turn The Tide (Johnny Hates Jazz song) is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Turn The Tide (Johnny Hates Jazz song), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vegyn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vegyn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Domdeparis (talk) 16:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Skyranger of utopia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Skyranger of utopia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Skyranger of utopia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

hi

I also left you a note on the Vegyn draft. I tried to explain why the rules are the way they are. As you can probably tell by now, there are a LOT of people who are sticklers for all the incombobulating rules around here. See WP:5 for the only ones that *really* do matter. But the sourcing thing is crucial to staying neutral, because the *way* wikipedia stays neutral, is by not parroting what you can already read on social media and blogs and whatever -- wikipedia is ideally supposed to only contain neutral summaries of solid information that is published by independent reliable people -- ethical journalists, brainy professors, that sort of thing. This does not mean that stuff on the internet does not count, just that it has to be the right kind of stuff on the internet. Click the little 'talk' button by my number if you want to edit my page and leave me a message, or you can ask more questions at the WP:TEAHOUSE where other people might be able to respond more quickly that me. 47.222.203.135 (talk) 11:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)