Jump to content

User talk:Slartibartfast1992/Archives/2007/November

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Redirect

Hello again. :) I noticed you had a redirect from my IP page to my user account. I changed it back so that people wouldn't be confused if they were redirected to a page they had no clue about. Just wanted to let you know! Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 09:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate the gesture, though. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering if you could show me the layout you mentioned in the article's talk page. You can edit my sandbox here. Thanks! Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 06:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Alright, looks good, thanks. I'll see if I can find the time to make a list of the ideas. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 04:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
I had the time, so I made a list of the ideas in my sandbox. It's a grand total of 55 ideas, so the list needs to be generalized more for inclusion in the article. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 22:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I probably shouldn't post replies to notes on my page to yours, so I'll just respond on my talk page. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for categorizing the ideas, I categorized the uncategorized ones. I also moved some of the comments on this page to my talk page for readability. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Copper(II) hydroxide

Yeas, sorry I was so slow. The last couple of months have been very busy- my Wikipedia contributions have been my lowest in years. Anyway, I did a few tweaks to the article and assessed it. It looks generally like the main bases have been covered, so I judged it to be a B.

I took out the "how to" information - an encyclopedia isn't supposed to include recipes for things (WP:NOT#HOWTO). As for work left to do on the article, I think the main thing would be to add a structure and properties section -crystal structure, that sort of thing. I also noticed that Chris's reaction scheme had an error in it, I pointed this out to him here. If he doesn't fix it (he only contributes occasionally), let me know and I'll redo it - but I thought he might prefer to do it himself. Let me know if I can help you out further - my life (hopefully) won't be permanently this busy! Cheers, Walkerma 02:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I think it would need a lot more work before it would make it as a good article. There are a lot of assertions in there that need clarifying and referencing, such as (in the opening paragraph), "quite likely a mixture..." I'm sure this is known, so either it is or it isn't; if it is the case, we need to cite a reliable source, if it isn't, it is wrong and we need to remove it. That sort of thing could apply. If Chris is not around, I may be able to locate the sources of the organic stuff he added, and maybe even to add to it. But probably not until the Christmas break...! Thanks, Walkerma 13:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Article assessment - American Inventor

As requested here I've assessed American Inventor. I've included a summary of my thinking here.--Opark 77 14:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that funny vandalism on my user page... The funny thing is, I don't think I've encountered that IP before. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 05:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)