User talk:Slushie202990

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Bad Romance, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Killing in the Name may be considered vandalism and you risk being blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Horkana (talk) 15:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poker Face (Lady Gaga song)

Not consecutive and requires a source. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary and statistics trivia

Please refrain from adding statistical trivia to articles: coincidences of chart positions with artist's birthdays are just that: coincidence. Not worthy of notice, and not worthy of adding to articles. Commentary like this is completely unacceptable, and you've been around long enough to know that.—Kww(talk) 17:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Rude Boy (song). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 16:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This should be a simple concept. Have a reliable source that you can link to, or do not add the material in the first place. I've had to revert your edits again.—Kww(talk) 19:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Right Round. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Kww(talk) 02:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2001 (U.S.), you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

final

I am vandalizing Slushie202990's personal page and I should be blocked from editing Shittypedia

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Tom Henning Øvrebø has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]