User talk:Smartdilshad

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Smartdilshad, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content about living people[edit]

Please stop reinserting unsourced claims about a living person's religion. Such claims MUST be supported by a citation to a reliably published source in which the person self-identifies as having/following a particular religious belief system. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a reliably published source. And as someone personally involved with the subject, you should not be directly editing the article at all. Please make your suggestions on the talk page, with appropriate sources to verify the claims. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Filmyfolks is not a reliably published source. We needs a place with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy, not a celebrity gossip site. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mushtaq Pasha[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mushtaq Pasha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source and merely being a director or writer or producer or even Director-Writer-Producer does not make someone eligible for an article. To have a stand alone article the subject must have been the subject of in depth coverage by a reliably published third party source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB only proves the existence, not the notability, of a project. And following the rules IS REQUIRED for "improving" the encyclopedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Please also note the downcasing.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 08:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mushtaq Pasha[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mushtaq Pasha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Shrikanthv (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mushtaq Pasha for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mushtaq Pasha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mushtaq Pasha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 13:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]