User talk:SnakeChess5/Archive 1

Nonsense

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Canada Goose. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rklawton 17:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

An honest mistake isn't vandalism, so it looks like I made one as well. There's been a rather persistent vandal who creates new accounts to target this article and a few others. I thought your account was another such case. Sorry about the inconvenience. Cheers, Rklawton 01:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Please use the edit summary

I almost reverted your recent edits to Academy Award, because you removed large blocks of text without any explanation. Please always summarize your edits; it is very helpful to others who are reviewing changes to the article. —P^urpleRA^IN 21:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your explanation. I think it would be worthwhile even on your minor edits to provide a short edit summary. It saves people from having to view the diff to know what your changes were. A simple tag like "spelling", "punctuation", "cleanup", etc. is way more informative than nothing at all. If you don't want to type that much, you can even abbreviate them.

There is an option in Special:Preferences that will warn you whenever you neglect to provide an edit summary, which can help you remember.

I'm not trying to come down on you; I appreciate your edits. I'm just making suggestions that will make it easier for the next person that comes along.

Have a great day. —P^urpleRA^IN 15:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of characters in Heroes, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Danko's first name has not been confirmed. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 21:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

It looks like you may have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia, at List of Heroes episodes. Please do not add such material without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Edokter • Talk • 14:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

Please do not create articles that are not reliably sourced, as you did with Orientation, Jump, Push, Fall and Acceptance. Articles must be verifiable through reliable sources, such as NBC or reputable news sources. Otherwise we cannot include it. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 14:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Heroes season 4

Template:Heroes season 4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ejfetters (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Heroes Series

Hi. I have to say I do not like the combined series template; It is way too cluttered, and it is not in line with standard practice for episode navigation. We have a list article to list all episodes; we do not need to add the complete list to every episode page. I'd appriciate it if you undid the change. I'll help if you want. — Edokter • Talk • 13:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Heroes Verifiable Information

I see you have reverted back Edokters edits, which I have supported. Verifiable Information is the most important thing on Wikipedia. I have presented verifiable information showing that we are using episode numbers from NBC and calling them Production Codes. Yet no one has presented any verifiable information supporting Production Codes. I do not wish to get into an edit war over this. I believe enough has been said. But as it stands because you are editing away verifiable information the page no longer meets the requirements for a featured list. If the situation does not change I will bring it to the Admins in charge of the featured lists attention. Please reconsider editing away verifiable information unless better information is provided to support your edits. Thank You —  MateyAhoy  11:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Notification

I have nominated List of Heroes episodes for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateyahoy (talk • contribs) 19:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Removal of production codes

Please refrain from making mass-edits while the topic of production codes is still under discussion. Such actions are dispruptive and have been reverted. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 14:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)