User talk:Sneakysnakestrikesagain

November 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bernard Francis Law has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bernard Francis Law was changed by Sneakysnakestrikesagain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903702 on 2020-11-07T05:44:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bernard Francis Law. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 05:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What about this is unconstructive or untrue Sneakysnakestrikesagain (talk) 05:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bernard Francis Law, you may be blocked from editing. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 05:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not vandalism it is true fact Sneakysnakestrikesagain (talk) 05:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When did a fact you do not like become vandalism? Sneakysnakestrikesagain (talk) 05:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bernard Francis Law. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mike Remmers have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mike Remmers was changed by Sneakysnakestrikesagain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95263 on 2021-02-08T16:41:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chris Broussard, you may be blocked from editing. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 23:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you grouch Sneakysnakestrikesagain (talk) 23:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dawson Knox, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dawson Knox. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Sea Cow (talk) 03:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a video that’s not uploaded yet how am I supposed to verify it. We all saw it. The man has strong forearms Sneakysnakestrikesagain (talk) 03:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Upper Big Branch Mine disaster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 02:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 02:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]