User talk:Snice021005

August 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas W. Sneddon Jr. has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thomas W. Sneddon Jr. was changed by Snice021005 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92032 on 2018-08-06T16:52:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thomas W. Sneddon Jr.. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Bashir, you may be blocked from editing. SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 17:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hey people. I don’t mind if you see all the warning notifications under my profile. Hehe sorry for vandalizing. I am new and was I guess “testing out the boundaries”- yikes! But don’t worry I would’ve never left the changes and now I’m here just to edit and edit correctly.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meanperson1234567, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Pete Burns. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 18:41, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Snice: ok. Sorry I didn’t know.

Sockpuppeting[edit]

Those suspected sockpuppets are not me Snice021005 (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]