User talk:Snipertron12

+ PLEASE NOTE! +
Be civil

Founded[edit]

I think i found the thing you were looking for[[1]] Ned1a Wanna talk? 15:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your sig[edit]

Just like a user once helped me with my signature when I was new, I thought I'd pass the favor along. Disregard Hoary; if you want a fun signature we can work it out!

What you have here is like... genuine programming. Wikipedia has its own set of templates, coding and span styles to use (a relic from the past) so you don't need to call on those "if" parameters.

Now, I can't tell you what I did because I personally make things much more complicated instead of just sitting down and figuring out how it works. But, here's the code:

Which displays

Snipertron12 | Talk | Cont |

It's kind of similar to what you had going; let me know if there's something you want to change about it. It's under the 255 character limit.

90% guarantee it won't break anything. Panini! • 🥪 00:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Piccadilly[edit]

Wikipedia:Piccadilly, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Piccadilly and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Piccadilly during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WPPiccadilly is only in its early stages and has yet to be finallized. Snipertron12 Talk 12:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on Wikipedia Slander[edit]

Just sipping tea and reading your discussion at the Teahouse about Wikipedia Slander. Here are my thoughts on some wikipedia slander video ideas:

-Overworked admins -Vandals coming to destroy every fact on the wikipedia -Sockpuppets trying to justify why the new draft article is now better than the article that recently got deleted for conflict of interest -1 million random Iranian towns with articles and less than 200 people -Chinese coverage of wikipedia (it is very poor.) -Following a wikipedia rabbithole and wasting 4 hours -Editors debating whether a source is reliable or not -Russia/Ukraine editors about to start a war on Wikipedia itself -The Sun pretending it is a reliable source -Teachers pretending that Wikipedia is not a reliable source when it is a more reliable source than most mainstream media outlets -That random person who has managed to make an article for themselves that has not been noticed or deleted yet -Editors making new articles instead of maintaining current articles

There, I think that's a good start. Spiralwidget (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]