User talk:Snm0056

Welcome!

Hello, Snm0056, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kittenpants, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 12:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kittenpants

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kittenpants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 12:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kittenpants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kittenpants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittenpants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kittenpants

You need to decide who or what this article is about. If it's about the magazine, as it is written now, then the contents must reflect that, and you cannot add every miscellaneous piece of information about Darci Ratliff that is not germane to the magazine. If the article is about Ratliff, then it needs to be totally re-written and moved to Darci Ratliff -- you cannot have it both ways, and trying to do so will only end up with the article deleted or gutted.

Also, it seems to be probable that you are in some way connected to the magazine or to Ratliff. If that is the case, you need to read our policy on editing with a conflict of interest. Failure to follow this policy could lead to your being blocked from editing, which I'm sure you would not want, and would be detrimental to the further development of the article.

One last point, a perusal of our policy about "owning" article would probably be useful as well. No editor "owns" an article, or has a veto over its content, and continuing to try to force your choices on the article without discussion with other editors to reach a consensus can also lead to being blocked, especially if one "edit-wars" to do so.

Please keep these policies firmly in mind when you are editing, thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the process of editing the article so that the focus -- which was meant to be on Kittenpants.org/Kittenpants (magazine) -- is more clear. To be perfectly honest, Ratliff is an acquaintance, but my original intention, again, was to create an article on Kittenpants (a site that I had visited and enjoyed before I ever met Ratliff). Furthermore, it was another Kittenpants fan's public wish for a Wikipedia article on Kittenpants that pushed me to get this process started. Thank you for the direction! -- snm0056

OK, great. Just be aware, since Ratliff is clearly the "principal" of Kittenpants.org, you don't need to remove everything about her, just stuff which is not related to the magazine or organization. Thus, I would restore the stuff youtook out about Kittenpants Productions and the IMDB link, which are related, but stuff about shoe stores in Seattle (or whatever) isn't realy relevant. Best of luck with the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kittenpants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kittenpants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittenpants (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TipsyElephant (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]