User talk:SoapSoapWhatIsSoap

May 2017[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Glenn Quagmire, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. You may want to read up on Pedophilia, and ensure that you're using correct spelling when you attempt to add a category to an article. DonIago (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SoapSoapWhatIsSoap, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi SoapSoapWhatIsSoap! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Squidward Tentacles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Reb1981 (talk) 02:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chef (South Park) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chef (South Park) was changed by SoapSoapWhatIsSoap (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869111 on 2017-05-29T11:58:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sponge, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 20:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cotton swab.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cotton swab was changed by SoapSoapWhatIsSoap (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964061 on 2017-05-30T02:29:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 02:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep doing things like this [1] you can expect a longer or indefinite block the next time. Acroterion (talk) 02:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to indefinite on basis of SPI. Acroterion (talk) 11:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Baxter (Last Man Standing) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Baxter (Last Man Standing) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Baxter (Last Man Standing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nate • (chatter) 21:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SoapSoapWhatIsSoap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Drmies, I deserve to be unblocked because back in 2016, when I replaced McGriddles with McShittles, I thought that was the actual name since Super-Size Me director Morgan Surplock referred to them as such in a 2015 tweet ("Mmmm, McShittles all day."). So my intentions were good. Plus, when they declined my unblock request on my HotlineBling account, they gave biased reasons and failed to elaborate on how my edits were childish; I could have easily improved back then since it had been half a year ago sine I was indeffed; because of their biased reasons, I wanted to exact revenge on them, so I have an excuse for my behavior. So please, let me be an exception to the blocking policy.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.