Jump to content

User talk:SolaryVeritas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

e Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KHBibby (talkcontribs) 08:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Deletion of talk page edits

[edit]

KHBibby - I see hear you have deleted edits in my talk page. I hope this is inadvertent, but please restore them. SolaryVeritas (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:SYNTH and WP:NOR. Tiderolls 19:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ritual abuse

[edit]

Ok, let me know, how is that a sexual abuse committed by Christian missionaries is "Satanic" ritual abuse? --Dereck Camacho (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dereck - Hmmmmm. Is critical thinking going to happen? Let us see. Young girl turned to sex slave by neighbors posing as missionaries and forced to watch sadistic ritual sacrifice of baby by religious peoples in darkest jungle. Then, horror, must drink blood of baby, along w others. In 1980's many of these stories in USA and Britian (see We Believe the Children by Beck), but also going back to Inquisition. Same for Salem witch trial. Of course, I not say if or if not true, but story is same as 10,000 other narratives - scholars call this "Satanic Ritual Abuse." No evidence ever produced in 500 years, but many witches burned at stake (read Kenneth Lanning - FBI special rpt)SolaryVeritas (talk) 01:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok but Wikipedia is not base in speculation, you can't put a category just because maybe, kind off, might be, is possible, that is "satanic ritual abuse", by the way something that is probably an urban legend and most serious scholars are skeptic that ever happen. So I'm sorry but if she was abuse by Christian missionaries in a missionary camp the category is not only wrong, is ludacris. So, should I call for a Wikipedia:Dispute resolution or can I reverse your editing? because I insist, the category is wrong. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 09:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dereck, You confuse ontological certitude and classification. What is your meaning, "the category is wrong"? I do not say SRA happened. With you, my personal agreement is SRA is "urban legend" and "skeptic that ever happened". Did abuse happen by missionaries? Don't know. This is speculation too. No evidence. But is a certainty that Krusi describes activities with common lable "SRA" (or "ritual abuse/RA" - both are same); ritual child sacrifice, blood sacrament. Also, movie and journalists that write Krusi story use these terms: "satanic", and "ritual abuse". For this reason I use category "SRA". Do you think this is not true? Oh, also please post discussion in Christina Krusi Talk page. It is useful for everyone. Appreciate SolaryVeritas (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if happened or not, I'm incline to believe her, but if we don't know if happened, then the category is wrong because we don't know if apply, and if happened, the category is wrong because there is nothing "satanic" about it, if any will be "Christian ritual abuse" for that matter. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 03:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dereck, This does not matter if it happened. You miss the point. Category "SRA" is about words used by Krusi and journalists/producers to describe story/narrative. On this I don't think we dispute anything. But curiosity grows in me. You say "I'm inclined to believe her." What do you you believe? That Krusi watched child murder and drank baby blood? SolaryVeritas (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe she was sexually abused by Christian missionaries, anywhere in the article says nothing about baby blood drinking. And then, according to whom her story is similar to what "journalists/producers" call SRA? according to you?--Dereck Camacho (talk) 07:04, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Dereck, maybe I see the problem. Do you read any 32 sources that are basis for wiki page? That is where you find "ritual child murder", etc. Do you speak German? You might use Google Translate, but won't help/w SRF movie. Sorry. SolaryVeritas (talk) 13:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]