User talk:Someguy555

Sock account...look like a banned editor.--MONGO 17:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Someguy555, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Have fun contributing, hopefully people will remember to assume good faith and not bit newbies ;-) Let me know if you have any questions. Karwynn (talk) 21:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated[edit]

I get the feeling you may deserve this:

*APPLAUSE!!!*

Karwynn (talk) 04:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Someguy555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I indefinitely blocked? All my posts are good faith with no policy violations! I don't even have a message or reason, and no one contacted/warned me. Was I blocked for asking a couple of pointed questions...? Please help, Sean Black who I have no interaction with blocked me for no legitimate reason!

Decline reason:

Total legitimate reason: Trolling! Being a troll. Completely trolling in every way you can think of. Troll Central. Thanks, and good night. ➨ ЯEDVERS 15:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user (IP address Someguy555) was blocked by Sean Black with the reason "Obvious troll".

Not so obvious. After seeing that this user posted comments that were not in agreement to those of some administrators, I had hoped he would not have been blocked for doing so. But it looks like he has. This is an entirely inappropriate method of dispelling disagreement. And if he was blocked for any reason having to do with his lack of contribs elsewhere, then that's not a good reason. Several users have second accounts that they use mostly for discussion of articles and policy, to having their mainspace edits being unduly scrutinized (read: stalked) by beligerent editors. Karwynn (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Karwynn, I think you are wrong. Sorry. I looked through the contribs and I'd be astonished if this were not a sockpuppet; I'd file an RFCU but it would almost certainlty be rejected as blatantly obvious. As to their mainspace edits, they were restricted to linking Jason Fortuny's (broken) livejournal entry to an article. This is just one of the drama queens jerking us around. Guy 22:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]