User talk:Sonny1998

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 14:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Philadelphia crime family, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Thomas.W. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Labour Party (Norway), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 10:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Padanian Parliament may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''Liberal and libertarian Padania''' ([[Italian Radicals]]/[http://www.movimentolibertario.com/ ML]]) - Leader: [[Marco Pottino]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Italian Liberal Party (2004) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|ideology = [[Liberalism]] ([[Liberalism and radicalism in Italy|Italy]]<ref>[http://www.partitoliberale.it/doc/MANIFESTO_

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to President of the European Council may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[Independent (politician)|Independent]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in Greece, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radical Civic Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radicalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lega Nord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Zippanova. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Conservative Party of Canada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Young Italy (modern)[edit]

Hello Sonny1998,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Young Italy (modern) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Benboy00 (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Italy of Values, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Alliance (South Africa), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Front for Victory, Senegalese Democratic Party, Liberal Party (Chile, 2007–), Palikot's Movement and Labour Party (UK), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 11:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Freemen of the South Movement, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 11:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Likud. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hertz1888 (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Popular Movement, National Alliance (Italy), Italian Social Movement and other articles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --RJFF (talk) 19:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Forza Italia[edit]

Hello Sonny1998,

thank you for adding references for your recent additions at Forza Italia (2013). However, you might not yet have fully understood Wikipedia's principle of WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources. Apparently, you have read and analysed Forza Italia's basic programme ("carta dei valori") and matched it to terms of political ideologies. This approach is called WP:original research. You read a primary source (the "carta dei valory") and drew your own conclusions. But this is not asked for on Wikipedia. This project only wants to gather and present information that is already published in secondary sources. Otherwise there would be constant argument among editors how to analyse, assess and classify the content of a certain primary source. What we need in this specific case is a reliable source explicitly saying that the new party is liberal, social liberal, green conservative etc. Not an editor (like you) who reads the programme and decides that some of the points are to be considered liberal, green conservative etc.

I would like to ask you to read and make yourself familiar with Wikipedia:policies and guidelines, especially the one on WP:No original research in order to make constructive and useful contributions to Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me or any other experienced Wikipedian for help (User:Checco and User:Autospark are experts on Italian political parties), or you can join the mentoring programme (Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user). As we obviously share a field of interest, I hope to co-operate with you in a constructive way and have fun editing articles together in the future. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 16:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brothers of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes[edit]

Hello Sonny1998,

I have to ask you again to please comply with Wikipedia:Policies and Guidelines, to provide WP:Reliable sources for your changes and additions, and to avoid edits that are not verifiable with adequate sources. This is very important if you want to make useful contributions to Wikipedia. As of now, nearly all of your edits get reverted by other users, because they are not compatible with Wikipedia's fundamental objectives. This is not what I suppose you want and it costs the time of other authors who could make more construtive contributions in the time it takes to check and revert your edits. Please do consider changing your editing behaviour in order to co-operate with other users and make useful contributions to our project. Again: if you don't know how to do certain things according to Wikipedia customs, just ask one of the more experienced users and everyone will be happy to assist you. Don't hesitate to ask me or any other Wikipedian. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for repeatedly making unsourced changes to a large number of articles, including mass changes to articles about political parties. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 16:54, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sardinian Reformers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive editing[edit]

Hello Sonny1998,

you have been asked several times to please stop your unconstructive and disruptive editing behaviour. Please consider this your last warning. Please make yourself familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you do not understand them, ask experienced Wikipedia editors to help you. But it is intolerable that you simply disregard our principle and work against the aims of this project and its volunteers. Users who repeatedly contravene Wikipedia rules may and will be blocked from editing. If you continue to arbitrarily add unsourced content, you will be reported and blocked. I would be happy if you could avoid this by simply changing your approach and starting to contribute constructively. I have already tried to explain you how to do this. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 18:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pentapartito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bank of Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 15:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Hi, Sonny. As far as I can see, you have never engaged in any discussion with any of the people who have attempted to talk with you here, and to inform you about Wikipedia's policies with regard to reliable sources, nor changed your editing practising in accordance with the advice you have received from experienced editors. Please use talkpages, this — your own — usertalk page as well as article talk pages. Wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborative project; you need to talk to people when they talk to you. The only thing to do to get your attention seems to be to block you from editing, and accordingly I've done so, for 48 hours. Please be more responsive when you return from the block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 19:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Broad Progressive Front (Argentina), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again[edit]

I see you haven't taken on any of the advice I gave you in my block message above. Please read it again (if you ever did read it). You've been blocked for two weeks. You'll soon be blocked indefinitely if you continue to ignore everything you're told about how Wikipedia works. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Craxism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese and Sergio Romano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

This is a minor edit Watch this page

By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.

Publish changes Show preview Show changes Cancel

The edit summary field appears above the "Save page" button

Hello Sonny1998,

please remember to always fill in the edit summary field below the editing box to describe and explain your edits. This makes it possible for other users to understand your edits. Thank you.

Please also be reminded that you have been warned many times not to do arbitrary edits, changes, additions and deletions without providing reliable sources. Verifiability is a basic principle of Wikipedia. Please understand that anyone who does not accept this principle, cannot contribute to this project. If you are unsure or do not understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or do not know how to create a reference, please inform yourself at the help pages, especially Help:Referencing for beginners. Alternatively, you may always ask other, more experienced editors to help you. Most Wikipedians are helpful and will be glad to assist you. Please take this advice seriously: you have already been blocked repeatedly. In case that you continue this way, your next block will be indefinite. I hope that you will not let it come this far. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 16:50, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely[edit]

This is a collaborative work. If you are not willing to discuss your edits with others, you are not welcome here. Any admin is encouraged to unblock if/when this user begins to discuss their edits, no need to check in with me first. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]