User talk:SonnyApril

May 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Locke & Key (TV series). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will assume good faith, but let us please be civil here. You were not assuming good faith from me either when you claimed my edits were "disruptive." From the beginning, I was not trying to cause conflict, I was just trying to improve the content on the Locke & Key page to make things more consistent. Your recent edit on the Locke & Key page was not constructive. And you have removed content that I have added to the Locke & Key page before, so I do not see why you are having such a huge issue with me removing that one piece of information. We can work out this conflict, but please, let us do it amongst each other and not let the conflict affect the content of the page itself. Adding "extremely" is not a constructive edit.SonnyApril (talk) 02:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect, you have removed character information on Rufus Whedon as well as Ellie Whedon. I did not removed any information. — YoungForever^(talk) 02:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Locke & Key (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — YoungForever^(talk) 02:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did remove character information from Rufus Whedon, but the information on Ellie's section I simply moved to Lucas's section. I did not remove that information, I relocated it. But I was referring to when I added to the episode descriptions on the page and you undid my additions. That is removing content. You have done it before, too. But I really do not want to dwell on this further. I see that you did not add "extremely" back in there. I appreciate that. I also see that you added back "Ellie's first love" back into Lucas's description. Thank you. I'll be willing to compromise and allow you to leave that information in Rufus's and Ellie's section, even if I still see it as unnecessary. SonnyApril (talk) 03:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is absolutely necessary as they are describing the characters which are relevant content, removing them are considered to be disruptive editing. — YoungForever^(talk) 04:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But what I've been saying is that none of the other characters on the page are detailed in quite the same way Rufus is. For example, as I stated earlier, it isn't mentioned in Kinsey's description that she is interested in art. It isn't mentioned in Jackie's description that she is a fan of Jane Austen. So why is Rufus the only character whose interests are explained? I did not remove it to be disruptive, I was just trying to create consistency between the character descriptions. I hope you can understand where I'm coming from, because I'm trying my best to explain. SonnyApril (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]