User talk:Sony22

December 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wema Sepetu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wema Sepetu was changed by Sony22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862036 on 2017-12-30T08:00:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sony22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wema Sepetu[edit]

I undid your edit to Wema Sepetu as it was unreferenced, or referenced by a blog which is not an acceptable source. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. To add a reference, please read Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. There is a tool that can help: See wp:RefToolbar/2.0. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Your edits are saved in the wp:page history. Please add references when you restore the content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, on Yvonne Cherrie, an article you created, you reverted my changes without providing a reason. The text was removed because it contained zero references. Our biographies of living persons policy gives any editor a free hand to remove, immediately, and without warning nor discussion, content about a living person that is unsourced. I will remove this content, you can undo when you have a placed an inline citation for the paragraph. !dave 17:59, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but do not reference Wikipedia. I am also treating the other source with suspicion, as it comes from Blogspot, and therefore is probably a blog and not reliable. Will check. !dave 18:04, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Looks alright, maybe. I've tagged the article as having potentially unreliable sources, since there appears to be a few others hosted on blog platforms. In in all it depends on whether there's some (effective) editorial oversight going on. !dave 18:19, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Michael. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 11:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elizabeth Michael, you may be blocked from editing. Dan Koehl (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Foolish Age. Dan Koehl (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Michael. This is pursuant to your deletions of sourced material today and our discussion on my talk page. Largoplazo (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 14:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]