User talk:Sophia Maprayil

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm JMS Old Al. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Old Al (Talk) 15:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On Article Names[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Page_name#Changing_the_displayed_title

I think this could help. Old Al (Talk) 16:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sophia Maprayil. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Old Al (Talk) 16:15, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore The Welcome[edit]

But see if the links help. I actually have to go now, but I'll be back later.

Old Al (Talk) 16:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Hope I can help.[reply]

Hello, Sophia Maprayil. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Maprayil, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Sophia Maprayil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]