User talk:Sophie201

November 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jonathan Gruber (economist) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jonathan Gruber (economist) was changed by Sophie201 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937887 on 2014-11-13T17:37:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan Gruber (economist) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jonathan Gruber (economist) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Booksworm ^Talk? 18:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jonathan Gruber (economist). Booksworm ^Talk? 18:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Jonathan Gruber (economist). --Booksworm ^Talk? 18:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan Gruber (economist). --Booksworm ^Talk? 18:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sophie201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made factual edits to this page. There was no vandalism. Just because others do not agree with post, does not make it wrong if it is factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophie201 (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

Your editing was contrary to the Biographies of Living Persons policy. Also, you were edit warring, and went over the no more than 3 reverts in 24 hours rule. Overall, your conduct fits the description of disruptive editing. PhilKnight (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.