User talk:SophieSarahCarr

Welcome!

Hello, SophieSarahCarr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hemingway edits[edit]

Hi SophieSarahCarr - I'm happy to see you working on one on the Hemingway short story articles. It's important that we use reliable sources to verify the information we add to articles. Some tips can be found in the welcome information above. Also please don't hesitate to ask me questions about formatting and things like that. You can either place questions here on this page, or come to my page by clicking the "talk" link at the end of my signature. You can also put questions on the article talkpage. I've watched all of those places. Thanks. Truthkeeper (talk) 01:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing - I had to remove the link to the story because it was deadlink. But we generally don't put things like that in the lead. You can read that link to see how a lead is written, but it's basically writing an introduction with your main points. To see how one of these stories should be done please have a look at Indian Camp. Also could you please point out the Indian Camp article to your professor in class so you all can look at as a class to see how it's done. Thanks a lot. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cat in the Rain[edit]

I've removed some of the empty sections and incomplete sentences from the work you did on Cat in the Rain; since readers may look at an article at any moment, it's better not to leave empty or incomplete work in a article unless you're working on it right at that moment. You might find it more productive to work in a sandbox, which looks like an article but isn't visible to the general encyclopedia readership, until you have your work ready to go into the main article. If you want to do that, put a note here and I'll show you how.

I'd also like to get in contact with your teacher -- can you let me know where the class is being taught and who the teacher is? Or ask your teacher to leave a note on my talk page. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sophie, it's really important not to copy from one article to another without providing attribution as I've done. Please give a chance to fix the references before you make anymore edits. Mike and I are trying to help, and it's important in a collaborative project like this for people to respond to messages. Can you please either respond here or on the article talkpage? You're doing a good job, but a few things need to be fixed and I'm willing to help. Thanks. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:54, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've responded on my page. You can either respond there or here. Whichever you'd like. Do you understand how I added an edit summary so that we can see that it was copied from one page to another? Truthkeeper (talk) 03:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hillsdale College, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Bolton and Brian Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, SophieSarahCarr. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Hillsdale College, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 20:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]