User talk:Sophielaursen
AfD nomination of The End of Iraq
[edit]An editor has nominated The End of Iraq, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The End of Iraq and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Article layout
[edit]Please refer to WP:MoS when creating new articles. Some of the articles you have created do not conform with this Wikipedia policy. Nishkid64 23:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I understand the book review ... beginners mistake, but which other articles do not conform with the Wikipedia Manuel of Style? Sophielaursen 13:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Democracy in Iraq for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Democracy in Iraq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy in Iraq until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jprg1966 (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)