User talk:South Philly

South Philly is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Gone for a while[edit]

Busy in real life. Email me if you want me to answer. South Philly 19:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/South Philly for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Gscshoyru 03:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bring it on bitch. South Philly 03:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had nothing to do with User:Student Erotica, and no sockpuppetry was actually proven.

Decline reason:

The meatpuppetry was obvious. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 03:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had nothing to do with Student Erotica, and no sockpuppetry was actually proven.

Decline reason:

Your attempt at convincing me is as successful as your attempt at convincing Irishguy. — Yamla 01:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User also posted a more extensive unblock request at WP:AN using a doppleganger account established and marked as such in 2006. I've blocked the doppleganger, which should be unblocked if the block here is ever lifted. GRBerry 01:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Frankly, he admitted the meatpuppetry in this edit: What you call meatpupptery, I call loyalty. Call it whatever you want...but it is still the same thing. He was knowingly gaming the system to edit war. IrishGuy ^talk 21:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocking not warranted

Decline reason:

Per the above declines. — Sandstein (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Over on the erotica page there was an edit war. An anon user started editing in some text under

151.201.155.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

151.197.111.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

When told to register, they did so as:

Student erotica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

In the end, Student Erotica got blocked as being my sock. Not so. There was nothing proven, just allegations. I got blocked. I gave up editing Wikipedia a while a go because I wasn't enjoying it. I don't necessarily plan to continue ever again, but this block annoys me, and it is being used against another user, who I happen to have worked with a lot.

I am sorry for being a contentious editor, please unblock me. Cordially, South Philly (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Philly is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

User talk:South Philly/Archive

Gone for a while[edit]

Busy in real life. Email me if you want me to answer. South Philly 19:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocking not warranted. Over on the erotica page there was an edit war. An anon user started editing in some text under :151.201.155.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) :151.197.111.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) When told to register, they did so as: :Student erotica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) In the end, Student Erotica got blocked as being my sock. Not so. There was nothing proven, just allegations. I got blocked. I gave up editing Wikipedia a while a go because I wasn't enjoying it. I don't necessarily plan to continue ever again, but this block annoys me, and it is being used against another user, who I happen to have worked with a lot. I am sorry for being a contentious editor, please unblock me. Cordially, South Philly (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While I am glad you finally submitted something more than "Am not!" as a counterargument, it seems that the consensus has been clear to the contrary. You've had enough of this; I'm revoking talk page access. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This looks to me like a very clear case of sockpuppetry - User:Student erotica is exhibiting a number of behavioral similarities to you, and is supporting your viewpoint apparently without question. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current-PhiladelphiaCOTM[edit]

Template:Current-PhiladelphiaCOTM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. TartarTorte 12:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]