User talk:SouthernKangaroo/Archive1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:SouthernKangaroo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, SouthernKangaroo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\talk 16:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey
Hi. Please do not spam the "thank" button. I have received 5 thanks from you within ten minutes (and to be honest that's a bit annoying). Thanks and happy editing :) ―Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 15:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi SouthernKangaroo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:24, Tuesday, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:User:SouthernKangaroo]]. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:|article's talk page]], and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.
did an oopsie tryna add that vandalism meter. was actually testing to see my fav version. (definitely been staying up late too much, i think you can tell) SouthernKangaroo (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Chetsford (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Zombie gunner
Most of Zombie gunner's images (as well as those of his multiple IPs) are probable copyright violations. He has been removing Deletion requests from nominated images in an attempt to block the evaluation process [1]. We have been having severe editorial issues through IP jumping on these few India-related article which have been damaged beyond recognition. There are many copyvio issues, falsification of sources, dates (For example change of image description at Commons false date then changing the description of Wikipedia [2]) etc.... And it is impossible to correct as IPs keep returning without accountability (apparently same user, from two alternating places, now Zombie gunner since today). There have been several efforts at blocking the user [3], but this is never ending. I have asked for article protection here and I am attempting to clean up.पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- If there are IPs still returning and editing the articles, maybe we could block them temporarily or indefinitely while the articles are being cleaned up. Page protection (like permanent protection) is a good idea too, so we could make it so that unregistered users can't edit. I can help you fix the articles too, if you want. ∞southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 17:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you Southern Kangaroo. His IPs are jumping several times a day... I did ask for Page protection here, which did sound like the best idea, but ended up with the Pending request system... Let's work together on improving these articles... पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sounds great! And hey, a pending request is better than it being ignored or denied completely. There might be a higher chance of the pages getting protected as well. ∞southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 17:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you Southern Kangaroo. His IPs are jumping several times a day... I did ask for Page protection here, which did sound like the best idea, but ended up with the Pending request system... Let's work together on improving these articles... पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Acceptance of pending edits
Hi, I wanted to let you know that the acceptance of pending edits such as this and this is not justified as they are not constructive. --Tamravidhir (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 16:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC) |
Unblock request
SouthernKangaroo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"Editing from 104.225.184.0/24 has been blocked", I myself did nothing ∞southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 12:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Accept reason:
IPBE granted for one month. See below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Lepecha people
Would like to know your source of information about The Lepcha People Rachelmitnl (talk) 17:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Not getting sources, but simply reverting/undoing. In the "Try to fix problems" section of W:EP, "Instead of removing content from an article, consider correcting inaccuracies, while keeping the rest of the content intact", and "libel, nonsense, and vandalism should be completely removed". ∞southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 17:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 217.130.92.146 (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
Your recent editing history at Parador shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Timeline of English history
Is this edit acceptable ? --Bejnar (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. ∞southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 23:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mason Carver
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mason Carver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melmann 19:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Your user page
I've removed and suppressed the link you had posted on your userpage as it is considered WP:OUTING of other users. Do not re-add that link (or similar links which out other editors) anywhere on Wikimedia sites. Thanks, stwalkerster (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- I won't add it again. I still strongly oppose the opinions of those editors though. ☮Senny is a Hippie☮ 15:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
UAA reporting
Please do not consider the "blacklist" a reason for blocking. Please read carefully the prominent note in orange at UAA before reporting, clear violations only. -- Alexf(talk) 15:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Please also do not report accounts with no edits unless the username is egregiously in violation of WP:U. We can't do anything in most cases if there are no edits to consider. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Your signature
With my eyesight, even with glasses, I find "☶☲Senny☶☲" very difficult to decipher in your signature. Could you please increase the contrast with the background a bit? Phil Bridger (talk) 20:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- (watching) Yes, this is per MOS:CONTRAST; also see WP:SIGAPP which is policy. Also note that per WP:SIGPROB,
Signatures that link to, but do not display, the user's username...can be confusing for editors (particularly newcomers). The actual username always appears in the page history, so using just the nickname on the relevant talk page can make your signed comments appear to be from a different person
. Not a major malfunction, but worth considering. If of course one is called SouthernKangaroo but wishes to be known as Senny, there's always the option to change the name itself. Happy days! Festive Greetings ——SN54129 21:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I went ahead and changed the color from "LightPink" to "LightCoral", which is more visible. Also, "Senny" is a nickname I have, I wouldn't change my username. Sorry for the trouble. (I haven't really been on lately, I've been feeling more tired, and this weather doesn't help.) ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲ (☎) 02:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. That look much better to me. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- You're welcome. :) ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲ (☎) 19:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. That look much better to me. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- I went ahead and changed the color from "LightPink" to "LightCoral", which is more visible. Also, "Senny" is a nickname I have, I wouldn't change my username. Sorry for the trouble. (I haven't really been on lately, I've been feeling more tired, and this weather doesn't help.) ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲ (☎) 02:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
XXI U-Boat
I don’t see what is wrong with adding a more relatable sentence to the page
-DawsonThechickendood Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
@DawsonThechickendood: - What you added to the article, "...and where sitting ducks to enemy boats", I originally thought it was vandalism. I also don't quite understand what you mean by that. I'd be glad to help if you need anything! ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲ (☎) 17:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
When someone says “vulnerable to combat damage” I am very confused, so I put something a little more simple there. Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Looking for Help
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm looking for advice on what to do to contribute to Wikipedia. As in, other than mostly anti-vandalism, what else can I do to help? I feel stuck and I don't know what to do. ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲ (☎) 15:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for being willing to contribute. You can visit the Community Portal for some areas where help is needed. Some users will hit the Random Article button in the left taskbar and see if the article that comes up needs any work. If there are certain topic areas that interest you, there may be a WikiProject in that area that describes areas that need assistance(such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia). 331dot (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
Proposal at the Village Pump to streamline the welcome template
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal to streamline the welcome template. This may be of interest to you as a member of the welcoming committee. Sdkb (talk) 04:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lawrencium, you may be blocked from editing. Regardless of the date, it is not okay to add false information into wikipedia articles Polyamorph (talk) 13:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:External links on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk/Guidelines/Medical advice on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases