User talk:Sparkerkc
Appearance
May 2022
[edit] Hello, Sparkerkc, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Samalama123 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I commented on Samalama123's talk page as well. We are not working together. It appears we both are adding information about a similar topic. I believe the information I am contributing to the page is important, and so am reverting changes when it is removed. I made the mistake of logging out since I was on a different device - my apologies. If my information is removed again, I will not add the other user's information back, despite it being relevant and important information as well. I am new to Wikipedia, so thank you for teaching me and I will attempt to do better in the future. Sparkerkc (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello to you both. I took a look at the additions. While the section added might be a bit long and could use some minor trimming, I can't see how Magnolia677 is justified in removing all of it. It's sourced, it's relevant - what possible motivation could there be for an outright deletion? I'd like to hear an explanation of that. JimKaatFan (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input. I have trimmed the LGBTQ+ History section of the Knox County article. Please feel free to make changes as you see fit. Thank you for your help and civility. I do believe that LGBTQ+ history is important to include in all spaces. Sparkerkc (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello to you both. I took a look at the additions. While the section added might be a bit long and could use some minor trimming, I can't see how Magnolia677 is justified in removing all of it. It's sourced, it's relevant - what possible motivation could there be for an outright deletion? I'd like to hear an explanation of that. JimKaatFan (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)