User talk:Spatulli

This user may have left Wikipedia. Spatulli has not edited Wikipedia since 2 February 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi. Feel free to leave a message.

Emo[edit]

Please refrain from telling me what I can and cannot do. You are attempting to introduce an image that does not add anything to the article. Many could argue that that image is not at all representative of "emos". You need to discuss the addition of any such image first, and if the image is boldly reverted, you should discuss with the editor why it was removed. As for other articles, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Nouse4aname (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Rob Van Eyck[edit]

Hello Spatulli. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rob Van Eyck, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Director of a movie sold in 37 countries is in my view an aserton of importance. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 12:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't forget to notify the creator of an article when you nominate for PROD, e.g. Rob Van Eyck--SPhilbrick T 19:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the article was created in 2009. Having said that, when I saw the PROD on 28 November, I glanced down to see the creation date of 17 November, and missed that it was 2009, not 2010. However, that's the editor's most recent edit, so I agree it is unlikely the editor is watching.--SPhilbrick T 22:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prod of Thompson Boat[edit]

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Thompson Boat, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Vox[edit]

Since you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Vox, this is a courtesy notification that I've resurrected the article after finding a fair amount of press coverage of the subject. Regards, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, great. It really looks a lot better than the previous version Spatulli (talk) 02:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zum Gali Gali[edit]

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Zum Gali Gali, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Pnm (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]