User talk:Spear

Welcome

Hello, Spear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Geurie, New South Wales have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bidgee (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Geurie, New South Wales. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deep Purple. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mlpearc powwow 12:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Janine Balding

Just wondering about your edit to Murder of Janine Balding at 06:25, 22 September 2013. See here. I presume a mistake? I've reverted it manually anyway. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 13:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Hi. From what I see., I removed the word "bludgeoned". Janine was not bludgeoned in any way. I know. I was the forensic (crime scene) officer who conducted the entire forensic investigation of her murder - including the post-mortem, autopsy examination at the Westmead Mortuary. Dr. Peter ELLIS was the attending pathologist and I assisted him with the examination and photographing of her body. I still hold a copy of the entire prosecution brief and every photograph I took during the investigation. One would assume that qualifies me to correct inaccuracies? Cheers.[reply]

Anzac/ANZAC Parade

Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_War_Memorial&diff=635941389&oldid=635940711 - do you have a reference that says the road name is capitalised? Everything I've seen (example) says that it's "Anzac Parade". Mitch Ames (talk) 06:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Janine Balding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Janine Balding, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 05:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I AM the reliable source. I was intensely involved in Janine's murder as the forensics Police officer who investigated same. I have a copy of the entire brief of evidence, including Moberley's statement - evidence that she gave at the coroner's inquest, committal and subsequent Supreme Court trials. All that evidence is on the public record and as court transcripts. I could expand this entry to the nth degree if necessary, but I'm just trying to add what I see as relevant, pertinent and interesting points. Perhaps a relevant citation could be statement page and paragraph numbers, with the name of the trial???

You'll need to cite to "reliable, published sources". Please review Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. You cannot simply cite to your own knowledge. Your personal knowledge may be correct, but does not qualify as a reliable source as that term is used in Wikipedia. It also appears to be "original research," another inpermissible practice. Please have a look at Wikipedia:No original research. TJRC (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too hard. Game over.

June 2015

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 04:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Floyd

Virtually all of your edits are in violation of our Manual of Style, or just matters of personal preference. Please stop, and familiarize yourself with WP:MOS before making further edits of this nature. --Laser brain (talk) 13:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC) No personal preferences here. All common English usage. I fail to see any 'violations' as you call them - but if that's your decision, so be it! Who am I to argue?[reply]

Every place where people write has house styles and conventions. You should familiarize yourself with these before making purely stylistic changes (such as changing numbers from words to figures). There are specific reasons for the way these things are, especially in Featured articles such as Pink Floyd. --Laser brain (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Spear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Janine Balding

Hi, can you provide a more complete cite than "The Daily Telegraph 25/09/2019"? A link to the article, the article's name or at least a complete date with an actual year? I'd like to keep your contribution in the article, but not if it cannot be verified. TJRC (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. That was obviously a typo/slip that omitted the 9 in 2019. The journalist who wrote the article is Janet Fife-Yeomans, chief crime reporter for The Daily Telegraph, who reported on the Balding murder from day one. I was the NSW Police Forensics officer who had carriage of the crime scene/s from day one, and I've stayed in touch with Janet since the days of the original court matters - Coroner's Court right through to the Supreme Court Trials. The details for the cited entry are taken directly from her reporting on Wilmot's appeal. Hope that helps. Thank you. Spear (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]