User talk:Sphotana dev

Welcome!

Hello, Sphotana dev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bhat did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Āryāvarta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allahabad prasati

See the Allahabad prasasti inscribed on Ashokan pillar in prayagraj. Sphotana dev (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would require a reliable source. Go through WP:RS. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allahabad pillar

Sorry for that, but i dont know how to add sources to the articles ,if can you guide me, you can get information from Reliable sources if you can read Allahabad pillar, R. G Talegari book The Historical Analysis Of Rog veda, I just wanted to expand the article and refine it in the way the Western articles present there region or culture it can you see when you see Alexander the great Or Roman Greek kings Articles and when you see Indian kings Articles there will be no Respect in presentation of king for Example the Ashoka the Great is written as only ashok with out using ashok and his full name is missing Devanamapriya priyadasi avam mahan rajachakravarti samrat ashok and same is done with chandragupta maurya, gupta emperors etc and the biharis in North India article as Abuse so I think you can correct them If it is inappropriate I can stop editing the wikipedia as I can joined recent few days I don't know much it is wrong then I can end the editing and delete the account. Sphotana dev (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an English Wikipedia, so the audience is global. Alexander the Great is known by that name (alongwith the honoric suffix) in the whole world, so it is used as such. Ashoka and Chandragupta are not known worldwide, so "the Great" suffix is not added. On the contrary, Mahatma Gandhi is well known in the world, so his article has "Mahatma" honorific in his name. Bihar is considered an east Indian state according to general consensus at WP:INB, Britannica (which we follow), most global sources and Indian govt. sources. As for the source for S. G Talegari book The Historical Analysis Of Rig veda. I'll check it and if I find that Samudragupta was called Maharajadhiraj of Aryavarta, then I'll add it. If that is not explicitly sourced then we cannot add it as per WP:OR. Can you tell me the correct name of the source book? I found one [1] The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis by Shrikant G. Talageri, but doesn't mention anything about Samudragupta and it is in snippet views. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sphotana dev, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sphotana dev! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Ashoka the great

According to you whole world means only Europe, for your information the Ashoka the great is known all over the world and in all countries of South East Asia, china, Japan, sri lanka, Europe, america, Africa and he has more references in different countries and languages sources in world then so called your honorific titled great the Alexander even he is not haved any reference in Indian or Chinese sources or other than Greek or Roman sources in Europe in total history suddely the colonist introduced to India as great king and imposed falsely without any reliable physical historical physical sources creating themselves by writing books and proving it by showing to others and the Ashoka has physical historical proofs about his views and reign in pillar inscriptions and he is not know worldwide you are telling read the article of Ashoka to know his total versatileness and the alexander is also not known in many countries other than Europe before colonial times or today in many Asia or Africa or South East Asian countries. so as per Wikipedia rules all the information written on alexander is false without physical evidence so if you follow correct rules then edit the alexander article with out reliable source and read Allahabad pillar inscription for samudragupta and I suggested S. G Talegeri book for aryavarta articles and to know the vedic people's and indo European people not for samudragupta for him it is sufficient allahabad pillar and I just want you to edit the information and write the same information in European article style to present as gently and fairly not inferiorly to them or you can do same colonial one sided presentation by showing them great and other inferior as you have done by projecting punjabus as elite and biharis as inferior in North India Article. Sphotana dev (talk) 16:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Sorry, I apologize for presenting it in rude way, I feel liked I have presented rudely because my grammars are not correct in English. Sphotana dev (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK. As I said, Wikipedia is for worldwide English view. Raise the issue on Ashoka article's talk page that you want the page to be renamed to "Ashoka the Great", although the article has Ashoka the Great mentioned. You can search Ashoka the Great in Wikipedia and it will direct you to that article. As for the Samudragupta part, link me the article here.

The Allahabad pillar mentions (Line 21) (Who) is great through the extraordinary valour, namely, the forcible extermination of many kings of Āryāvarta such as Rudradēva, Matila, Nāgadatta, Chandravarman, Gaṇapatināga, Nāgasēna, Āchyuta-Nandin and Balavarman; who has made all the kings of the forest regions to become his servants. about Samudragupta and how he has exterminated the kings of Aryavarta. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Learn

That's ok we will see afterwards and I doesn't know how to edit properly and correctly. only I wished to show in some fair and ornate model as western articles are present and I think you will edit the same information in some fair and ornate style. Well you are verifer or an author in Wikipedia Sphotana dev (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Teej, you may be blocked from editing. Interstellarity (talk) 17:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bihari culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhat. Dharmalion76 (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bihar. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Sorry for opposing , but actually it was authentic and correct which I had written about the bhat or if you want to verify you can check about aryabhata, banabhatta, kumarila bhat itself in wikipedia its genuine and realiable so can you do me a favour by rewriting it by citing reliable sources which I have tried but failed as it did not appeared on the page. so help me to add reliable source by rewriting by you... Sphotana dev (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with...

Sphotana dev (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bihar section you added should be sourced just like the other sections. We cannot assume based on other articles. That's called original research. I provided a set of things to read here that may of your help. You can also check WP:CITE and WP:REFBEGIN articles as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to contest the block, please follow the instructions given in the block message above. Wikipedia does not consider itself a reliable source. I checked the articles on Bāṇabhaṭṭa, Aryabhata and Kumārila Bhaṭṭa, and even if they were reliable sources, they don't say that those people where given the title "Bhat", much less that anybody currently using that surname traces his or her ancestry to them. Huon (talk) 16:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bhatta- Bhat- Butt

So if you believe it's wrong to include bhatta as Bhat then you should note that it is also wrong to include butt as Bhat in kashmir column in the article, since both the words are different in phonitics so then you should have to remove it also from the article as it voilates the wikipedia rule of vandalism as the article has no sources to correct it or if it is correct then include both bhata as Bhat which has arrived from bhata so you can recheck and can verify it.. Can you send me any sample of writing or editing of page in wikipedia with realiable sources citations or how to insert it on page I want to learn but not understanding completely.. Sphotana dev (talk) 14:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chandragupta Maurya, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Begoon 06:44, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhat, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove sourced content like you did here, here Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Maurya Empire. Begoon 06:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Indo-Scythians. Wario-Man (talk) 07:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sphotana dev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, I know that I edited the page many times but the page haryana is missing Ancient period history whenever I had edited Or corrected the ancient history of haryana the other person had removed or disrupted it by eradicating ancient history and writing on medieval history and page has many incomplete information on history of haryana, the only thing I done was to provide complete information on the page to get better view for that reason if I was blocked I think it's uncorrect and misleading, so I request to unblock me from block list.

Decline reason:

Your edits were inappropriate and as you don't see the problem, we cannot lift the block. Hint: the problems were explained to you, over and over again, above. Yamla (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.