User talk:Spinwispy

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Agent00x. I noticed that you recently removed content from Egyptian Armed Forces without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Agent00x (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok my friend, I will present to you my point of view Spinwispy (talk) 15:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is my pleasure and honor to speak with you Spinwispy (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The historian and military analyst Kenneth Pollack presented his new book, Armies of Sand: Past, Present, and Future of Arab Military Effectiveness, according to Pollack. There is a legend that says that the best parts of the Egyptian army were in Yemen, and this is not true, according to Pollack, so I deleted it Spinwispy (talk) 15:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at User talk:Buckshot06. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not intentionally harassing anyone Spinwispy (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for him my friend Spinwispy (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But I want you to listen to me please Spinwispy (talk) 18:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I never intended to annoy anyone, believe me[edit]

No, I never intended to annoy anyone, believe me Spinwispy (talk) 18:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because the disruption was unintentional, this block automatically expires after 31 hours. When the block expires, please do not message other users again in the way you did before. Article-related discussion belongs to the talk page of the article itself. For example, the talk page of the Earth article is Talk:Earth. The talk page of the Sun article is Talk:Sun. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I learned a lot, thank you for bearing with me[edit]

I learned a lot, thank you for bearing with me Spinwispy (talk) 11:39, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces (User, User talk, Wikipedia, Wikipedia talk, Help, and Help talk) for a period of 2 weeks for sadly continuing the disruptive behavior despite the acknowledged advice. I'm not sure if we're being trolled, but here's an opportunity to use article talk pages while being blocked from further disrupting other pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response to the second block[edit]

Sections merged, heading added ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your position man, believe me, I'm not intentionally sabotage at all. In good faith, I just hope that the sentence will be reduced Spinwispy (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, I am not intentional, my friend, and even if the penalty was not reduced, I would have deep respect and appreciation because I understand your tremendous efforts. Spinwispy (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your advice is valid, but I entered a completely wrong place, I admit it, and I understand your position Spinwispy (talk) 20:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spinwispy, if you would like to add a sentence to an existing section, please click "edit" (or "edit source") next to the heading of the section. You can then add your comment at the bottom of the section. Creating separate headings for each sentence is confusing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you my dear brother, thank you for your valuable advice[edit]

Thank you my dear brother, thank you for your valuable advice Spinwispy (talk) 08:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please sir, according to the Israeli commander who led the attack on the Green Island, he said that they incurred 40 dead and wounded people, and the goal was to occupy the Green Island, which he completely failed to achieve, according to his confession. Blomus 6[edit]

Please sir, according to the Israeli commander who led the attack on the Green Island, he said that they incurred 40 dead and wounded people, and the goal was to occupy the Green Island, which he completely failed to achieve, according to his confession. Blomus 6 Spinwispy (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to the unreliable reference that claims an Israeli victory in the Battle of the Green Island and the killing of all the Egyptians who were on the island, meaning that the Israeli commandos incurred 40 dead and wounded people and failed to occupy the island, according to Ami Ayalon, who led the attack on the island[edit]

Contrary to the unreliable reference that claims an Israeli victory in the Battle of the Green Island and the killing of all the Egyptians who were on the island, meaning that the Israeli commandos incurred 40 dead and wounded people and failed to occupy the island, according to Ami Ayalon, who led the attack on the island Spinwispy (talk) 08:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:The Egyptian army per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Egyptian army. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]