User talk:Split55

August 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Chocolate (The 1975 song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Robbers (song), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Tourist History, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Split55, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Split55! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Franz Ferdinand (band), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dusti. I noticed that you recently removed some content from All These Things That I've Done with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 22:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Undercover Martyn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 18:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tourist History. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Something I Need, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 20:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Something I Need, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 00:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Feel Again. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]