User talk:Spyglass27
A tag has been placed on Pc.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Lordjeff06 (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on PC.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 16:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Issue with PC.com article[edit]
Since the article keeps being deleted, I thought I would respond to you here. The issue is not with the tone or writing of the article, the issue is that the subject of the article, PC.com, does not seem to have any significant coverage in sources outside of itself. As such, it does not qualify as a notable subject under our guidelines (see WP:N). Please read that guidelines, and also read the Wikipedia's Guide to Creating your First Article to understand more about what sorts of articles are typically accepted at Wikipedia. If you are having trouble creating or editing articles in the future, or if you have any specific questions at all, please feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. I will be glad to help out in any way that I can. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 16:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- As above. The subject of the article does not at present meet the notability guidelines; until that point, it's not going to stick around. Please don't keep reposting it at this time. If you feel the deletions are improper, please bring it up at deletion review instead of recreating it repeatedly. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)